On Friday the RB, lxn1177, slowed down to a point where these error
messages were generated. We investigated this and found out that the
machine was running slowly due to a number of large file transfers. We
noticed that these transfers were from the user cms003, which was mapped
to you and the large files were in the output sandbox and in excess of
600mb. The Sandboxes should not be used for transferring large files.
Large file should go to an SE.
Having large files in the sandbox will slow down the RB make it unusable
by all users including yourself.
Laurence
Urs Langenegger wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I have the following problem
>
> lxplus058>grid-proxy-info
> subject : /O=GRID-FR/C=CH/O=CSCS/OU=CC-LCG/CN=Urs Langenegger/CN=proxy
> issuer : /O=GRID-FR/C=CH/O=CSCS/OU=CC-LCG/CN=Urs Langenegger
> identity : /O=GRID-FR/C=CH/O=CSCS/OU=CC-LCG/CN=Urs Langenegger
> type : full legacy globus proxy
> strength : 512 bits
> path : /tmp/x509up_u7721
> timeleft : 49:34:09 (2.0 days)
>
> lxplus058>edg-job-status https://lxn1177.cern.ch:9000/SZzrdhr0PDbGsF62CMq_Hg
> *************************************************************
> BOOKKEEPING INFORMATION:
>
> Status info for the Job : https://lxn1177.cern.ch:9000/SZzrdhr0PDbGsF62CMq_Hg
> Current Status: Done (Success)
> Exit code: 0
> Status Reason: Job terminated successfully
> Destination: ce01-lcg.projects.cscs.ch:2119/jobmanager-lcgpbs-cms
> reached on: Thu Jun 23 23:31:33 2005
> *************************************************************
>
> lxplus058>edg-job-get-output https://lxn1177.cern.ch:9000/SZzrdhr0PDbGsF62CMq_Hg
> **** Error: API_NATIVE_ERROR ****
> Error while calling the "NSClient::ns_output_sandbox" native api
> AuthenticationException: Failed to establish security context...
>
>and the following questions:
>
>o What is the problem? Can I cure it? (Could it be related to output
> sandbox size?)
>
>o Is there a webpage or similar where I could find information on this?
> (I googled and search a handful of FAQs and ggus, but did not find
> anything.)
>
>o Is there another mailing list better suited for mails like this?
>
>Many thanks for your help.
>
>Cheers,
>--U.
>
>
|