On Mon, 23 May 2005, Markus Schulz wrote:
> Hi Joe,
> the RBs have no concept of which sites they are using. This comes via
> the BDII that the RB queries during match making and
> ranking.
> To figure out what is wrong one needs to know which RB(s) is (are) used
> and on which BDIIs they depend.
>
> Then the first step of debugging is to have a look at what the BDII
> reports about your site.
>
> If your site is missing, but your site BDII answers to ldap queries you
> should look at the RB's BDII configuration file, your site
> might be excluded.
Or the site BDII might be too slow to answer the top-level BDII query,
in which case the site drops out of the top-level BDII. I suspect that
this was the case, given the problems on the CE reported by Ian Fisk.
> The next step is to do a joblist match with a very general jdl. The
> site should appear in the list of matching CEs
>
> Another problem might be hidden in the configuration of the UI. The UI
> config file contains the RBs to use and some
> default lines that are added to the jdl. Have a look at them.
>
> If this doesn't help some in depth debugging with and information
> system expert is the next step.
>
> markus
>
> On May 23, 2005, at 4:54 PM, Joseph L. Kaiser wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have CRAB users whose jobs don't appear to be getting the cmslcgce
> > even though they are specified in their jdl's. We do not appear to be
> > listed in the RB's even though our bdii is clearly reporting. Can
> > someone please look to see if we are reporting something incorrectly?
> >
> > Who should I direct these sorts of issues to?
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Joe
> >
> >
>
> ************************************************************************
> *******
> Markus Schulz
> CERN IT
>
|