JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for LCG-ROLLOUT Archives


LCG-ROLLOUT Archives

LCG-ROLLOUT Archives


LCG-ROLLOUT@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

LCG-ROLLOUT Home

LCG-ROLLOUT Home

LCG-ROLLOUT  2005

LCG-ROLLOUT 2005

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: ALERT MESSAGES - RGMA

From:

Min Tsai <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

LHC Computer Grid - Rollout <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sat, 21 May 2005 22:13:15 +0200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (185 lines)

Hi,

This is the explanation from Gstat's help:

RGMAService_RChkFilter

RGMAService Check Filter: checks if RGMA services are running properly 

        Column Name:    rgma
        Values:         .           - RGMA Service not found for site
                        ok          - RGMA Services are up
                        other       - RGMA error found
        
        This test queries RGMA 'Service' and 'ServiceStatus' table for a 
        list of RGMA services and their current status.  This plugin 
        checks if all the services are "up" and if the last update 
        timestamp is not older than 10 minutes.  Either of these 
        conditions raises an alert.
        
        Services found in 'Service' table with MeasurementDate older
        than 1 week are ignored and assumed to be decomissioned. 

Gstat assumes that these service status entries are updated every minute, so
if it finds entries older than 10 minutes is raises a "note" alert. The
checks are done against UTC time.

For error message below was shown at 19:28 UTC on Gstat.  R-GMA appears to
be functioning properly for this site. But there seems to be too long of a
delay between the query and the time the check is made.  So instead of
comparing against the current time, the check should be done against the
time of the query.  I will modify the code so that this is done instead.
Thanks for bring up this issue.

Alastair,

I also noticed that no entries are found for all sites when I do the
ServiceStatus latest query except for Taiwan-LCG2.  This is also reflected
on the R-GMA browser: http://lcgic01.gridpp.rl.ac.uk:8080/R-GMA/index.html

However, the continuous+old queries are able to produce more results.  Maybe
there is something wrong with the latest secondary producer now.

BR,
Min


MEASUREMENT TIME    UP
SERVICE URI  MESSAGE
2005-05-21 19:15:21  y
http://lcg00128.grid.sinica.edu.tw:8080/R-GMA/ArchiverServlet  mem usage:
49%
2005-05-21 19:15:22  y
http://lcg00128.grid.sinica.edu.tw:8080/R-GMA/ConsumerServlet  mem usage:
49%
2005-05-21 19:15:23  y
http://lcg00128.grid.sinica.edu.tw:8080/R-GMA/CanonicalProducerServlet  mem
usage: 49%
2005-05-21 19:15:23  y
http://lcg00128.grid.sinica.edu.tw:8080/R-GMA/DBProducerServlet  mem usage:
49%
2005-05-21 19:15:24  y
http://lcg00128.grid.sinica.edu.tw:8080/R-GMA/LatestProducerServlet  mem
usage: 49%
2005-05-21 19:15:24  y
http://lcg00128.grid.sinica.edu.tw:8080/R-GMA/BrowserServlet  mem usage: 49%
2005-05-21 19:15:24  y
http://lcg00128.grid.sinica.edu.tw:8080/R-GMA/StreamProducerServlet  mem
usage: 49%

ALERT MESSAGES
 ArchiverServlet has not been updated for 600!
 ConsumerServlet has not been updated for 600!
 CanonicalProducerServlet has not been updated for 600!
 DBProducerServlet has not been updated for 600!
 LatestProducerServlet has not been updated for 600!
 BrowserServlet has not been updated for 600!
 StreamProducerServlet has not been updated for 600!


test:: edg-rgma -c "latest select  ServiceStatus.URI, ServiceStatus.up,
ServiceStatus.message, ServiceStatus.MeasurementDate,
ServiceStatus.MeasurementTime  from ServiceStatus, Service where
ServiceStatus.URI=Service.URI and  Service.site='Taiwan-LCG2'"





-----Original Message-----
From: LHC Computer Grid - Rollout [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Alastair Duncan
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 3:18 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [LCG-ROLLOUT] ALERT MESSAGES - RGMA

I suspect that this is a problem with the GIIS scripts and timezones.
All sites seem to have this same alert. The service status tuples are
being published ok. The tuple Measurement Time is inserted in UTC Z
timezone(GMT) by the servicetool. Looking at the browser on lcgic01
service status table the latest times all look good ie. within the last
hour. So why the alert is happening leads me to suspect the scripts that
are doing the time comparison. I think that they may be comparing the
published time with the local time where the script is run(I'm assuming
here that this is in Taiwan) and that the times therefore may be way
out. This is just a guess as I haven't seen the scripts.

Alastair

On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 11:53, Juan Jose Pardo Navarro wrote:
> You can see the GIIS:
> http://goc.grid.sinica.edu.tw/gstat/
> 
> UAM-LCG2 
> 
> 
> RGMAService Check
> Result: note
> alert_history
> info.gif
> 
> MEASUREMENT TIME    UP
SERVICE URI  MESSAGE
> 2005-05-20 10:29:14  y
http://grid013.ft.uam.es:8080/R-GMA/BrowserServlet  mem usage: 27%
> 2005-05-20 10:29:54  y
http://grid013.ft.uam.es:8080/R-GMA/StreamProducerServlet  mem usage: 24%
> 2005-05-20 10:29:45  y
http://grid013.ft.uam.es:8080/R-GMA/LatestProducerServlet  mem usage: 24%
> 2005-05-20 10:29:34  y
http://grid013.ft.uam.es:8080/R-GMA/DBProducerServlet  mem usage: 26%
> 2005-05-20 10:29:15  y
http://grid013.ft.uam.es:8080/R-GMA/CanonicalProducerServlet  mem usage: 27%
> 2005-05-20 10:30:05  y
http://grid013.ft.uam.es:8080/R-GMA/ArchiverServlet  mem usage: 24%
> 2005-05-20 10:29:24  y
http://grid013.ft.uam.es:8080/R-GMA/ConsumerServlet  mem usage: 26%
> 
> ALERT MESSAGES
>  BrowserServlet has not been updated for 600!
>  StreamProducerServlet has not been updated for 600!
>  LatestProducerServlet has not been updated for 600!
>  DBProducerServlet has not been updated for 600!
>  CanonicalProducerServlet has not been updated for 600!
>  ArchiverServlet has not been updated for 600!
>  ConsumerServlet has not been updated for 600!
> 
> 
> test:: edg-rgma -c "latest select  ServiceStatus.URI, ServiceStatus.up,
ServiceStatus.message, ServiceStatus.MeasurementDate,
ServiceStatus.MeasurementTime  from ServiceStatus, Service where
ServiceStatus.URI=Service.URI and  Service.site='UAM-LCG2'"
> 
> 
> 
> El vie, 20-05-2005 a las 12:47, Alastair Duncan escribi:
> > I believe that there is a script which is being run which checks the
> > date and time of tuple inserted in to the Archiver for service and
> > service status. As the servicetool by default updates service data every
> > hour it is probably checking to see that the latest value is within the
> > last hour. It can be assumed that some service data is out of date for
> > some reason. 
> > 
> > Which machine is giving these alert messages? Is there any other
> > information associated with it?
> > 
> > Alastair   
> > 
> > On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 11:14, Juan Jose Pardo Navarro wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > I see:
> > > 
> > > ALERT MESSAGES
> > >  ArchiverServlet has not been updated for 600!
> > >  ConsumerServlet has not been updated for 600!
> > >  CanonicalProducerServlet has not been updated for 600!
> > >  DBProducerServlet has not been updated for 600!
> > >  LatestProducerServlet has not been updated for 600!
> > >  StreamProducerServlet has not been updated for 600!
> > >  BrowserServlet has not been updated for 600!
> > > 
> > > That mean these alert messages?
> > > 
> > > thanks for all.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
November 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
September 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
February 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
February 2021
January 2021
November 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
February 2018
January 2018
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager