Hi Jiri,
I have noticed on the GIIS Monitor that our R-GMA Service test was
failing too.
However running the command on the page gave the correct result.
edg-rgma -c "latest select ServiceStatus.URI, ServiceStatus.up,
ServiceStatus.message, ServiceStatus.MeasurementDate,
ServiceStatus.MeasurementTime from ServiceStatus, Service where
ServiceStatus.URI=Service.URI and Service.site='CERN-CIC'"
+------------------------------------------------------------+----+-----------------------------------------------+-----------------+-----------------+
| URI | up |
message | MeasurementDate | MeasurementTime |
+------------------------------------------------------------+----+-----------------------------------------------+-----------------+-----------------+
| http://lxb2009.cern.ch:8080/R-GMA/CanonicalProducerServlet | y |
Service running, current memory usage at: 42% | 2005-05-02 |
14:57:44 |
| http://lxb2009.cern.ch:8080/R-GMA/DBProducerServlet | y |
Service running, current memory usage at: 42% | 2005-05-02 |
14:57:44 |
| http://lxb2009.cern.ch:8080/R-GMA/LatestProducerServlet | y |
Service running, current memory usage at: 47% | 2005-05-02 |
14:57:43 |
| http://lxb2009.cern.ch:8080/R-GMA/StreamProducerServlet | y |
Service running, current memory usage at: 42% | 2005-05-02 |
14:57:44 |
| http://lxb2009.cern.ch:8080/R-GMA/BrowserServlet | y |
Service running, current memory usage at: 47% | 2005-05-02 |
14:57:43 |
| http://lxb2009.cern.ch:8080/R-GMA/ArchiverServlet | y |
Service running, current memory usage at: 42% | 2005-05-02 |
14:57:44 |
| http://lxb2009.cern.ch:8080/R-GMA/ConsumerServlet | y |
Service running, current memory usage at: 42% | 2005-05-02 |
14:57:43 |
+------------------------------------------------------------+----+-----------------------------------------------+-----------------+-----------------+
7 Rows in set
You should try the command for your site. I think that there is
something wrong with the GIIS monitor.
Laurence
Jiri Kosina wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have just heard from Marcin Radecki that R-GMA service is going to
> be considered as critical test in SFT quite soon.
>
> This, among other things, means (when looking at the latest report),
> that 31 sites, if I count correctly, would be marked 'CT', even if
> everything else, apart from R-GMA, was tested as OK.
>
> I have posted many times questions regarding non-working R-GMA setup
> (I am using YAIM on RH 7.3 on both farms I manage, and I _never_ got
> R-GMA working, neither did I receive any helpful advice) (for example
> here:
> http://www.listserv.rl.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=ind0502&L=LCG-ROLLOUT&P=R14255&I=-3
> - with no reply, and more can be found).
>
> I personally think that making the service, which fails on 31 sites,
> which are healthy when not counting R-GMA as not a very lucky step.
>
> Thanks for any comment,
>
|