Hi Fotis,
The update at CERN started the same day of the release. However, due to
number of machines and services we have, it has only just been
compleated. Also, you may have also noticed on the rollout list the
problems we had with the disk servers and the RBs. This slowed down the
updated as fixing this took some time. There was also the EGEE conference :)
We Yaimed
5 experiment UIs
9 experiment RBs
2 SEs (one classic and one dcache)
6 BDIIs
1 MON
1 Proxy
Deployed
lxplus as a UI for all people with CERN accounts
Yaimed + Quattored
2 LSF CEs
1852 WNs
Hopefully next time we will be able to do this much faster.
Laurence
Fotis Georgatos wrote:
> Hi Markus,
>
> Markus Schulz <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> status of LCG2 release 2_4_0 ( now with a color scheme that allows
>> Windows users to see the scale!)
>
> [...]
>
>>> According to our information system we have 136 sites and 50 are on
>>> the latest version.
>>> The VERY-VERY-VERY old contains all sites that are neither 2.4.0,
>>> 2.3.1 or 2.3.0.
>>> Note, we have still more than 20 of them.
>>
>
> It is interesting to note that the curves of "upgrade rates"
> show some striking similarity, with comparable lead-in slope.
> I think this translates roughly to 3 sites per day, at best,
> so the current number of 60 fresh sites should be no surprise at all.
>
> There is certainly something to learn from that, and this comment
> is particularly prompt now that the 3 week time window for 2.4.0 expires.
>
> I noticed that the CERN site (LXBATCH) does update right at the end, too.
> Now, should this be considered a good or a bad practice? And by whom? ;-)
>
|