On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Louis Poncet wrote:
>
> > Aie ME i never test the rh73 apt-get install. If Laurence can ask to
> > Oliver what he think abouyt that. If you stille have this problem after
> > an update go download it and install it by hand before the apt-get
> > install or dist-upgrade command. This j2sdk profile package is just a
> > set of config files.
>
> Hi Louis,
>
> the problem indeed lies in the repository. See the mixup in the following
> output (getting when issuing apt-get dist-upgrade) of the 'rh73' and 'sl3'
> versions of that RPM:
>
> Need to get 1264B/158MB of archives.
> After unpacking 118MB of additional disk space will be used.
> Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y
> Get:1 http://grid-deployment.web.cern.ch
> apt/LCG-2_4_0/rh73/en/i386/lcg_rh73 j2sdk_profile 1.4.2_08-sl3 [1264B]
> Fetched 1B in 0s (13B/s)
> Failed to fetch
> http://grid-deployment.web.cern.ch/grid-deployment/gis/apt/LCG-2_4_0/rh73/en/i386/RPMS.lcg_rh73/j2sdk_profile-1.4.2_08-rh73.noarch.rpm
> Size mismatch
>
> So it doesn't help, when I install
> http://grid-deployment.web.cern.ch/grid-deployment/gis/apt/LCG-2_4_0/rh73/en/i386/RPMS.lcg_rh73/j2sdk_profile-1.4.2_08-rh73.noarch.rpm
> manually, becuase the repository lists different version of the package
> (the sl3 one), which can't be installed.
Indeed. The 'sl3' version accidentally ended up in the 'rh73' list;
I fixed the 'rh73' rpm, but some APT package/list must be regenerated
before "apt" will be satisfied. Oliver may not have time this week,
so you could use some "force" flag to ignore inconsistencies for now.
|