Hi
You could also consider CentOS which is binary compatible with RH
Enterprise. It's what we run at NIKHEF.
JT
Enrico Ferro wrote:
> Alexander Kryukov wrote:
>
>> Dear Colleagues,
>>
>> There are many flavor of Scientific Linux: pure SL, SL CERN, SL FNAL.
>> What else?
>>
>> I have two main questions.
>> 1. What are specific features of SLC with comparison of pure SL?
>> 2. What kind of SL is preferable for LCG-2 for non-CERN sites?
>
>
> I suggest you the "pure SL", it is perfectly equivalent for middleware
> and applications and does not include many ad-hoc customizations included
> in the CERN and FNAL flavour that could be useless/confusing (e.g. mail
> client configured by default to use cern mail server).
>
> Ciao!
> --
> Enrico Ferro Ist. Naz. di Fisica Nucleare - Padova
> Address: via F. Marzolo, 8 - 35131 Padova - ITALY
> Email: [log in to unmask] Phone: +39-0498277154
|