On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, Kyriakos G. Ginis wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 02:54:59AM +0100, Maarten Litmaath, CERN wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Kyriakos G. Ginis wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 02:47:10AM +0200, Kyriakos G. Ginis wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 01:38:33AM +0100, Maarten Litmaath, CERN wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > those jobs did not reveal a smoking gun either, so now I have restarted
> > > > > the proxy renewal daemon in debug mode: can you submit a few more jobs?
> > >
> > > Hi Maarten,
> > >
> > > These 5 jobs did not abort due to proxy expiration, and are still
> > > running, so I guess that whatever you did fixed the problem.
> >
> > OK, I now undid the change: can you submit 5 more jobs to see if the
> > problem comes back?
>
> I submitted 5 jobs several hours ago and they are still running.
>
> https://lxn1188.cern.ch:9000/y_g1jbfZt417-AKRWxikeA
> https://lxn1188.cern.ch:9000/r9y7L6F728uWxAU_6QIy7Q
>
> https://lxn1188.cern.ch:9000/5m8xZ6c5sOWwM_8GdrwHMg
> https://lxn1188.cern.ch:9000/12WfIpxFlJ3yQCzszLe4uw
> https://lxn1188.cern.ch:9000/e41ZOv9ixuz3yvTyDAlUCw
>
> Perhaps the problem was just a matter of restarting the proxy renewal
> daemon...
Meaning that we still have no clue about the problem...
Can you submit, say, 50 more such jobs? Thanks.
|