JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for LCG-ROLLOUT Archives


LCG-ROLLOUT Archives

LCG-ROLLOUT Archives


LCG-ROLLOUT@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

LCG-ROLLOUT Home

LCG-ROLLOUT Home

LCG-ROLLOUT  2005

LCG-ROLLOUT 2005

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Grid identity tokens and Security Mailing lists

From:

David O'Callaghan <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

LHC Computer Grid - Rollout <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:41:08 +0000

Content-Type:

multipart/signed

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (59 lines) , smime.p7s (59 lines)

Hi All,

Hopefully people won't object to continuing this discussion here...

On 10/03/05 12:11, Ian Stokes-Rees wrote:
> I have returned to security considerations for grid job scheduling and
> execution.  I am wondering if there are people on this list, people you
> know, or mailing lists to whom I could post a few thoughts and questions
> regarding grid security.

There's the EGEE Middleware Security Group
([log in to unmask]), but their activities are
mostly restricted to the security plans for EGEE.

> Specifically, I'm thinking about the use of "identity tokens".  For
> example:
>
> Bob gives Alice a token which only Alice can use to:
>
> access Bob's data
> generate data in Bob's "file space"
> withdraw "grid bucks" from Bob's grid bank account
>
> and this token would have limits on it (amount of data generated,
> maximum "grid bucks", lifetime).

To me this doesn't sound like an "identity token" but rather an
"authorization token": in some sense the resource doesn't care who Bob
gives authorization to as long as:

  * the authorization doesn't exceed Bob's own authorization;
  * Bob is authorized to delegate his authorization in this way; and
  * the resource can be sure that Bob genuinely made this authorization.

The first point should be obvious. The second point is a special case of
the first: one of the things Bob may or may not be authorized to do is
to delegate his privileges. If Bob is a lead scientist he will be
authorized to delegate to his assistants, but an undergraduate student
can't delegate the authorization she was given in order to do her
assignment. The third point boils down to having Bob digitally sign the
delegation.

This is more-or-less the system implemented in KeyNote:
http://crypto.com/trustmgt/kn.html

> Anyway, I'm sure this kind of thing has done before, or has been
> considered and discarded, so I'd like to find out more about it.  If
> not, I'd like to push the idea around with other people.

I'm not sure about the HEP/LCG/EDG context, but some related work has
been done by my colleagues in University College Cork
(http://www.cs.ucc.ie/~simon/pubs/ispdc04.pdf). I've tried to search for
similar work but it's pretty difficult to search the web for a generic
term like "keynote", or that "trust management" has so many different
interpretations.

David

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
November 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
September 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
February 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
February 2021
January 2021
November 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
February 2018
January 2018
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager