Sotomayor, Maniel wrote:

> Hi again Maarten,
>
> OK, let's do the right thing.
>
> I was thinking of adding the suffix ia64 to our site name (ie HPTC-LCG2ia64).
> The ldap base search name would be something like:
> ldap://ice.prd.hp.com:2135 -b mds-vo-name=HPTC-LCG2ia64,o=grid

OK.

> You won't see the ia64 version because i changed the bdii config to eliminate the note.
>
> Do I have to request access to the GOCDB again for adding the new site ?
> I still have the same cert.

I suppose you would indeed repeat the procedure you followed for
PRD and Brazil, i.e. request a new site to be added to the GOC DB,
a site that happens to have the same admins as PRD itself.
In any case HP-PRD is the ROC.

Send your request to Matt Thorpe and/or Dave Kant (both in CC).

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Mon 3/7/2005 6:11 PM
> To: Sotomayor, Maniel
> Cc: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [LCG-ROLLOUT] LCG2-IA64 at HPTC-LCG2
>
> On Mon, 7 Mar 2005, Sotomayor, Maniel wrote:
>
>
>>Good day Maarten,
>>  I noticed that after adding my second CE, the GIIS Monitor page =
>>reports something like:
>>dataGridVersion:   CE-lcg20041217_1327_DecRel.txt **NOTE** old version =
>>or does not use correct format: LCG-X_X_X
>
>
> Hi Maniel,
> a second CE must not act as a site GIIS, but in your case we then have
> the problem that your site can not yet use a single "dataGridVersion"
> for both CEs.  We have these options:
>
> 1. Ignore the version mismatch for now and publish the IA-64 resources
>    along with the IA-32 resources (as a second CE and SE).
>    Since lcg20041217_1327_DecRel is fairly close to LCG-2_3_1 this may
>    not be such a bad idea.
>
> 2. The proper solution: publish the IA-64 site independently.
>    In that case, give us its site BDII address and the LDAP search base,
>    and we will add it to the all-sites zone.  To have it picked up by the
>    daily tests, though, you must add it to the GOC DB as a separate site.
>
> This matter seems to show another limitation of the information system:
> a different "dataGridVersion" for a CE requires a whole new site...
>
>
>>  I just did the upgrade to the 2.3.1 release, but the Version reported =
>>is the one installed on my IA64 CE (ice) instead of the IA32 (ce) one.
>
>
> I suppose you changed something, because I do not see that now.
>
>
>>  Also, I can see that a job list match failed on today tests.  Is the =
>>dataGridVersion value related to this problem ?
>
>
> No, it would mean your site did not show up in the test zone BDII.
>
>
>>  Further, I don't see the queues hosted by ice being reported on the =
>>GIIS Monitor web-page.  I am missing something ?
>
>
> Your site BDII is not publishing them.
>