Hi,
hepman-lcg blocked the email because BCC or implicit addresses are
forbidden for anti-SPAM reasons.
cheers
alessandra
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005, Torsten Harenberg wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> after replying to a mail sent to
>
> [log in to unmask] and
> [log in to unmask]
>
> I got a couple of delivery failures. I assume the e-mail addresses subscribed
> to those lists are usually required to work, so I put them here:
>
> From: [log in to unmask]
>
> This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.
>
> Delivery to the following recipients failed.
>
> [log in to unmask]
>
>
> From: [log in to unmask]
>
> This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
>
> A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
> recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
>
> [log in to unmask]
> Disk quota exceeded:
> mailbox is full: retry timeout exceeded
>
>
> From: [log in to unmask]
>
> This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.
>
> Delivery to the following recipients failed.
>
> [log in to unmask]
>
>
> From: [log in to unmask]
>
> Hi. This is the qmail-send program at info.novsu.ac.ru.
> I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
> This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
>
> <[log in to unmask]>:
> user is over quota
>
>
> From: [log in to unmask]
>
> The original message was received at Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:13:51 +0300
> from root@localhost
>
> ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
> [log in to unmask]
> (reason: 550 5.1.1 User unknown)
> (expanded from: <[log in to unmask]>)
>
> ----- Transcript of session follows -----
> 550 5.1.1 /home/kiam-lcg-support/.forward: line 2: [log in to unmask] ... User
> unknown
>
>
>
>
> Then we've two addresses which are obviously mailing lists themselves and are
> awaiting approval:
>
>
> From: [log in to unmask]
>
> Your mail to 'Grid.support' with the subject
>
> [Fwd: Re: MEDIUM: Security incident / dteam AUP violation in
> progress]
>
> Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
>
> The reason it is being held:
>
> Message has implicit destination
>
> Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive
> notification of the moderator's decision.
>
>
> From: [log in to unmask]
>
> Your mail to 'Hepman-lcg' with the subject
>
> [Fwd: Re: MEDIUM: Security incident / dteam AUP violation in
> progress]
>
> Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
>
> The reason it is being held:
>
> Message has implicit destination
>
> Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive
> notification of the moderator's decision.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Torsten
>
>
>
--
********************************************
* Dr Alessandra Forti *
* Technical Coordinator - NorthGrid Tier2 *
* http://www.hep.man.ac.uk/u/aforti *
********************************************
|