Eygene A. Ryabinkin wrote:
> Maarten, good day!
>
>>>I have a small question about the site BDII information: should we publish
>>>there only services that we are running by our site or we should publish
>>>the
>>>services we are using by our site.
>>
>>Only the services you are _running_.
>
> OK, will change it back as it was before today. The reason I've added
> foreign RB to our BDII is that our ALICE coordinator asked me today what
> RB we are using and how can it be extracted from the information system.
You have a point there, but we do not want every site to publish somebody
else's services! The RB used by a site is put in its UI configuration,
so I do not think it really has to be in the information system.
> I've glanced at others BDIIs and noted that they are publishing foreign
> services. So I've took the (wrong) opinion of masses.
That was due to the wrong default in site-info.def.
> So, the next quesion: is there any way to extract the information about
> services _used_ by site from the information system?
>
>
>>The comment in site-info.def is better:
>>
>>BDII_REGIONS="CE SE RB PX VOBOX" # list of the services provided by
>>the site
>
> Yep, probably I should open an item in Savannah?
For any middleware functionality or configuration issue one can always open
a bug in Savannah.
|