Hi,
this is also what Chris suggested in one of the previous emails in this
thread. It is a good idea as long as all the rpms required are part of the
operative system (no extras) and there are no conflicts between
experiments rpms.
cheers
alessandra
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, Graeme Stewart wrote:
> Rolf Rumler wrote:
>> Hi Rod,
>>
>> Le 21 oct. 2005, à 19:35, Rod Walker a écrit :
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Is there a central place where we can list the Atlas requirements on WN
>>> software. A few sites choose to strip down the rpm list to what they
>>> consider the bare minimum. They are happy to put things back that atlas
>>> need but we need some way to convey this information.
>>> If there is no central place then I`ll create an Atlas wiki page and
>>> distribute the url.
>>> In the meantime, please could sites with stripped installations, and
>>> accepting the Atlas VO, make sure bc is availabe (An arbitrary precision
>>> calculator language).
>>> The only site I see right now without it is.
>>> lcgce.ijs.si
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Rod.
>>
>>
>> As others suggested in this thread, it seems that the VO part of the
>> operations portal (or CIC portal) is a good place. For the moment, nearly
>> all the staff is on the 4th EGEE conference, so please be patient, we'll
>> contact you directly on the "what and how" ASAP.
>
> This is doubtless the correct place to publish the information, but as a
> practical measure for sites can we turn that information into a metarpm,
> e.g., lcg-UI-atlas.
>
> If we put this into the apt repository then the YAIM setup scripts can ensure
> that each WN has the right packages for supported VOs - and that list can be
> changed with an updated rpm if necessary.
>
> Cheers
>
> Graeme
>
>
--
********************************************
* Dr Alessandra Forti *
* Technical Coordinator - NorthGrid Tier2 *
* http://www.hep.man.ac.uk/u/aforti *
********************************************
|