Hi,
I don't think so - I have all data in a local database too. The other fact,
that I can successfully query and get results from the registry just 5 or 10
minutes after official SFTs are performed, IMHO, suggests that archiver is
not able to handle all requests.
Regards, Antun
-----
E-mail: [log in to unmask]
Web: http://scl.phy.bg.ac.yu/
Phone: 381 11 3160260, Ext. 152
Fax: 381 11 3162190
Scientific Computing Laboratory
Institute of Physics, Belgrade
Serbia and Montenegro
-----
---------- Original Message -----------
From: Frederic Schaer <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 17:13:12 0200
Subject: Re: [LCG-ROLLOUT] Apel on SFTs
> Hi,
>
> It is possible that those sites that do not fail have data available
> in the local database. Even if the archiver is down, the data can
> then be retrieved...
>
> Cheers,
> Fred
>
> Antun Balaz wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >looking at https://lcg-sft.cern.ch:9443/sft/lastreport.cgi you can see
that
> >majority of sites have W or X on APEL test. I am curious how it is
possible
> >that some sites, however, have O? If the archiver is down (suggested by
lots
> >of Ws), it is down...
> >
> >On the other hand, when I initiate SFT from my UI, I am getting OK on all
> >tests, and querying RGMA from shell returns reasonable results as well.
> >
> >Is it possible that the load is too high during SFTs performed for all
> >sites, and that the registry is not able to handle all requests?
> >
> >Regards, Antun
> >
> >-----
> >E-mail: [log in to unmask]
> >Web: http://scl.phy.bg.ac.yu/
> >
> >Phone: 381 11 3160260, Ext. 152
> >Fax: 381 11 3162190
> >
> >Scientific Computing Laboratory
> >Institute of Physics, Belgrade
> >Serbia and Montenegro
> >-----
> >
> >
> >
------- End of Original Message -------
|