Hi Patryk and Judit,
this is really curious! Look at the
https://lcg-sft.cern.ch:9443/sft/sitehistory.cgi?site=zeus02.cyf-kr.edu.pl
I have submitted two SFT2 tests to your site (2005-09-01 09:02:06; 2005-09-
01 09:27:54), and they were both completely successful. The first one used
the older SFT2 version (max 1 day old LcgRecords tuples), and the second one
used the new version (max 3 day old LcgRecords tuples), fixed by Judit. So,
everything seems OK. But, in the meantime, official SFT2 test (2005-09-01
09:05:35) failed on APEL test! Judit, any clues?
On the other hand, all SFT2 test (old and new one submitted by me and an
official one) succedeed:
https://lcg-sft.cern.ch:9443/sft/sitehistory.cgi?site=ce.phy.bg.ac.yu
Mystery, isn't it?
Regards, Antun
-----
E-mail: [log in to unmask]
Web: http://scl.phy.bg.ac.yu/
Phone: +381 11 3160260, Ext. 152
Fax: +381 11 3162190
Scientific Computing Laboratory
Institute of Physics, Belgrade
Serbia and Montenegro
-----
---------- Original Message -----------
From: Patryk Lason <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 09:01:07 +0200
Subject: Re: [LCG-ROLLOUT] RGMA - 0 count
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 03:34:55PM +0200, Antun Balaz wrote:
> > Don't agree. In my experience, if you configure it properly, it works.
> >
> > Anyway, it has nothing to do with SFT2, since you can do rgma queries
from
> > the command line and verify if your site is publishing accounting data
or
> > not: if it is, you will pass the test.
> >
> > Looking at the accounting data of Christos' site, you can see that they
were
> > published up to August 26. So, APEL/RGMA is working properly, but the
data
> > is not published. It can happen for a lot of reasons (local log files
> > corrupted or missing, parser files on CE or MON misconfigured etc).
> >
> > Why so many sites have this problem: there were some errors in apel
> > configuration by yaim scripts. They are fixed now, but probably most of
the
> > sites used the older yaim version, and so ended up with misconfigured
apel...
>
> You are right, it's RGMA related problem, but I think I have
> properly configured apel, and here you can see the results from
> today (2005-09-01 06:17:09):
>
> https://lcg-sft.cern.ch:9443/sft/info/zeus02.cyf-kr.edu.pl/sft_2005-
> 09-01_06.05.29.html#sft-apel_2005-09-01_06:17:09
>
> ------------------------------------
> Checking if LcgRecords latest archiver is accessible:
>
> + rgma -c 'select count(*) from LcgRecords'
> + grep 'Rows in set'
> + set +x
> LcgRecords latest archiver is working.
>
> Checking if LcgRecords tuples are present for the site (max 3 day
> old):
>
> ++ rgma -c 'select count(*) from LcgRecords where
> ExecutingCE='\''zeus02.cyf-kr.edu.pl'\'' and
> MeasurementDate>='\''2005-08-29'\''' ++ grep '^|' ++ cut -f 2 -d ' '
> ++ tail -n 1 + count= + set +x
>
> Count:
> No Apel result set - FAILED!
> ------------------------------------
>
> but when I run the command by hand on the WN it works properly:
>
> # rgma -c 'select count(*) from LcgRecords where
ExecutingCE='\''zeus02.cyf-kr.edu.pl'\'' and MeasurementDate>='\''2005-08-
29'\''' | grep '^|' | cut -f 2 -d ' ' | tail -n 1
> 156
>
> It's not a critical test yet, so let's say that I don't care about
> the results ;-). The best way to see if it's a site problem is to
> set the "Apel test" as critical.
>
> Regards,
> Patryk
>
> --
> Patryk Lason
> [log in to unmask]
> phone: (+48 12) 6323355 e.107, http://www.cyfronet.pl
------- End of Original Message -------
|