JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for INT-BOUNDARIES Archives


INT-BOUNDARIES Archives

INT-BOUNDARIES Archives


INT-BOUNDARIES@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

INT-BOUNDARIES Home

INT-BOUNDARIES Home

INT-BOUNDARIES  2005

INT-BOUNDARIES 2005

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Hans Island update (Canada-Denmark)

From:

Martin Pratt <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Martin Pratt <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 23 Sep 2005 08:28:46 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (94 lines)

Further to Dan's update on Hans Island, here's a report that suggests
that at least some Canadians are keeping the dispute in perspective....

m a r t i n 


FINALLY, A WAR CANADA COULD WIN

Jack Knox, Victoria Times Colonist 03/08/05

The problem with going nose to nose with Greenland is the Inuit think
it's foreplay. Which is why we're going to fight Denmark instead,
dropping the gloves in a border war. 

This will come as a shock to those who were unaware we even share a
border with Denmark, which we don't, really. Our actual neighbour is the
aforementioned, quasi-independent Greenland -- the Danish Factory Outlet
Store, as it were, way out on the edge of town beside Ellesmere Island
and Costco. Greenland, Denmark, whatever -- bring it on, we're going to
war. 

What we're incensed about, apparently, is Hans Island. It sits in the
narrow channel that separates Greenland from Canada. Both countries
claim it, like the last beer in the fridge. 

We are puzzled: why would Greenland want Hans Island? It's not so much
an island as an outsized rock, with neither people nor trees (though it
may have a Starbucks). 

But then, what do Canadians actually know about Greenland, anyway? We
spend all of our time fussing about our rambunctious, party-hardy
neighbours to the south, only to suddenly discover the real threat is
from the quiet guy upstairs, the one we never think about. Probably has
a body in the freezer. 

Certainly Canada and Greenland have clashed in the past, first over
their Inuit hunting our musk oxen on Ellesmere Island, then over Arctic
sovereignty, and then, most recently, over the ownership of Hans Island.

Musk oxen? Sovereignty? Hans Island? What's next, our womenfolk? Are we
to simply turn jelly-kneed and abandon defenceless (OK, unpopulated)
Hans Island to the ineluctable onslaught of voracious, insatiable
Greenlandic imperialism? 

Let's take them now, I say. Get the Greenlanders before they get us.
Wage war and conquer the bastards if they don't drop this outlandish
claim on Hans Island. Sixty-four forty or fight. 

Only one problem: We're the ones who started this scrap. After allowing
the diplomatic dispute to simmer away for 30 years, it seems Canada
suddenly chucked gas on the fire last month when our defence minister,
Bill Graham, landed on Hans Island in a helicopter, kind of provocative
like, as though he was trying to start something. (I think I saw him put
his hand on Greenland's girlfriend's butt, too.) The obvious question
is: Why? 

Why would reasonable, peaceful, sober Canada go picking a fight with
Greenland? The obvious answer is: We could win. Damn it, the rest of the
world gets to go to war, getting drunk and kicking hell out of each
other, while goodie-two-shoes Canada, the designated driver, picks up
the pieces. No more. Forget the blue beret. For once, we want a black
leather jacket. 

OK, it wouldn't be a classic clash -- more like that pee-your-pants
funny Wayne Gretzky-Neal Broten purse-swinging fight of 1982 -- but we
could still take Greenland. It may be twice the size of B.C., but it
only has half the population of Saanich. 

We'll take on the Danes, too, if necessary. Their win-loss record ain't
great. Know how long it took Germany to roll over Denmark in the Second
World War? Less than a day. You can't get your cable hooked up that
fast. "We were captured by telegram," is how one Danish politician put
it. 

Better be careful, though. Denmark might be tougher than it looks, one
of those deceptively small, wiry types like Vietnam. One moment you're
shoving him in the chest and next thing you know he's kicking your butt
all over the bar while the girls in the UN laugh at you. 

Still, it would prepare us for the big rematch with Uncle Sam. In 1859,
in one of the great "hold my beer and watch this" moments in history, we
went at it with the U.S. in a border dispute known as the Pig War.
Ultimately, we sobered up and jammed out, losing San Juan Island in the
process. That one still grates. 
Which brings us to the unresolved tug-of-war over Dixon Entrance,
between the Queen Charlotte Islands and Alaska. If Canada is willing to
get physical with Greenland over Hans Island, it should do the same with
the U.S., right? 

Besides, I think we could win. 


 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager