many pct ceo's, especially those from hospital or community trust
backgrounds, still have the belief that we are somehow employees of them and
will dance to their tune. point out their mistake!
>From: Tim Heywood <[log in to unmask]>
>Reply-To: GP-UK <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: Bad day at the office/Censorship
>Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 08:50:52 +0100
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from smtp.jiscmail.ac.uk ([130.246.192.55]) by
>mc8-f36.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Mon, 16 May 2005
>00:51:37 -0700
>Received: from LISTSERV.JISCMAIL.AC.UK (jiscmail.ac.uk) by
>smtp.jiscmail.ac.uk (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id
><[log in to unmask]>; Mon, 16 May 2005 8:51:05 +0100
>Received: from JISCMAIL.AC.UK by JISCMAIL.AC.UK (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release
>1.8e) with spool id 55461154 for [log in to unmask]; Mon, 16 May
>2005 08:51:05 +0100
>Received: from 130.246.192.53 by JISCMAIL.AC.UK (SMTPL release 1.0i) with
>TCP; Mon, 16 May 2005 08:51:05 +0100
>Received: from mail.nhs.net (mailout.dc2.nhs.net [216.239.198.26]) by
> fili.jiscmail.ac.uk (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j4G7owcA001335 for
> <[log in to unmask]>; Mon, 16 May 2005 08:51:00 +0100
>Received: from [192.168.32.164] (helo=md04.prod.pr.contact.secure-ops.net)
>by mail.nhs.net with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.41) id
> 1DXaNJ-0001Po-YA for [log in to unmask]; Mon, 16 May 2005
>08:50:53 +0100
>Received: from 192.168.32.162 (EHLO mail.nhs.net) (192.168.32.162) by
> md04.pr.contact.secure-ops.net (MOS 3.5.3-GR FastPath queued) with
> ESMTP id AUR09036; Mon, 16 May 2005 08:50:53 +0100 (BST)
>Received: from [172.21.144.146] (helo=consulting1) by mail.nhs.net with
>asmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1DXaNI-0004xL-cL for [log in to unmask];
>Mon, 16 May 2005 08:50:53 +0100
>X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78jFSUQUPuG6zT17XbWZfHIs1xEjivs3Vnlo=
>X-RAL-MFrom: <[log in to unmask]>
>X-RAL-Connect: <mailout.dc2.nhs.net [216.239.198.26]>
>References: <[log in to unmask]>
> <[log in to unmask]>
><[log in to unmask]>
><[log in to unmask]>
><007701c5586d$c1e58050$0400000a@RAJSam306>
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4927.1200
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4927.1200
>X-Tagged-Body: TEXT section
>X-CCLRC-SPAM-report: -4.9 : BAYES_00
>X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.38
>Organization: Hagley Surgery
>Precedence: list
>Return-Path: [log in to unmask]
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 May 2005 07:51:37.0971 (UTC)
>FILETIME=[16CE7430:01C559EC]
>
> >
> > 3) I have been told that as a doctor I cannot be seen to criticise the
>NHS
> > on a web site associated with the NHS and my surgey. I have been told
>that
> > should I persist, my terms and conditions of service would be examined
>"AND
> > SOME ARE OPEN TO INTERPRETATION". I would be taken up on my terms and
> > conditions as well as reported to the GMC.
> >
>
>Hmmm.... Without wishing any hassle for you personally, I'd like to see a
>test case. YOUR surgery, YOUR website, YOUR right to freedom of speech. I
>can't say I know the fine detail of all the GMC's documents, but I'd be
>surprised if as a profession we have a duty to keep our traps shut where we
>can see failure in the NHS. Rather the opposite I would think.
>
>On the other hand, I reckon PCTs could make it very difficult for
>individual
>practitioners if they really wanted to. I refer to my previous post in this
>topic.
>
>Tim
>
>
>***************************************************************************
>This e-mail is confidential and privileged. If you are not the intended
>recipient please accept our apologies; please do not disclose, copy or
>distribute information in this e-mail or take any action in reliance on its
>contents: to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Please
>inform us that this message has gone astray before deleting it. Thank you
>for your co-operation.
>***************************************************************************
|