> A couple more quick questions.
> You mentioned that number of sessions is a consideration. If you have
> only 2 sessions, can you even do a mixed effects at the second level
> in a repeated measures when all subjects are included in the analysis?
> You do get a map, but seems sparse for some subjects even at p=0.05
> uncorrected.
>
> Also, if I'm interested in how combining sessions improves
> quantification of results, and say I want to compare results obtained
> combining 4 runs with that obtained using only the first run, is it
> wrong to use a mixed effects when combining the 4 runs because it uses
> the cross-session variance in its estimation? Should I compare 1 run
> with '4 runs mixed' and also with '4 runs fixed'?
>
> -BRad
>
|