JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for FORCED-MIGRATION Archives


FORCED-MIGRATION Archives

FORCED-MIGRATION Archives


FORCED-MIGRATION@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

FORCED-MIGRATION Home

FORCED-MIGRATION Home

FORCED-MIGRATION  2005

FORCED-MIGRATION 2005

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Evaluation of UNHCR's Protection Information Section

From:

Forced Migration List <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Forced Migration List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 15:04:32 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (1 lines)

United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
Evaluation Policy and Analysis Unit

**Terms of Reference**

Evaluation of the Department of International Protection’s Protection
Information System (PIS)


1. Background
With the disbanding of the Centre for Documentation and Research (CDR) in
2000, and despite the fact that several of its functions were redeployed
within the organization, concerns were raised regarding functions relating to
UNHCR’s mandated responsibilities, namely, legal database development and the
production of country of origin information and background papers. In
response, the Department of International Protection was designated to create
a Protection Information Section (PIS). The purpose of PIS was to backstop
UNHCR’s protection role by undertaking the provision of timely and reliable
country of origin analysis and legal reference information/materials to assist
policy formulation and decisions relating to refugee status determination. The
primary tool and focus for the dissemination of such information was to be
Refworld, the CD-Rom containing information on UNHCR as an organization,
legal, national legislation, and countries of origin, Refworld, created in
the mid-ninties in the former CDR, had been discontinued in 2000. The first
challenge facing the new PIS was to update the content and re-issue it. Though
a user survey of Refworld has been undertaken in 2003, a comprehensive
evaluation has not. Moreover, the last evaluation of UNHCR’s protection
information function was undertaken in respect of the Centre for Documentation
and Refugees in 1993.

In the light of this background, and concerns regarding the continuing
usefulness of the Refworld CD-Rom, there is a clearly indicated need at this
time for an evaluation of PIS, and its major information product Refworld on
website and CD-Rom.

2. Purpose of the Evaluation
The purpose of the evaluation will be to review PIS outputs, products and
management, with special emphasis on its main product Refworld, with a view to
assessing Refworld’s relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, value-added, impact
and sustainability.

2.1 Major Evaluation Question
What are the key components of an effective protection information system?

3. Areas of Assessment
The evaluation will review all PIS outputs, products and services as they have
developed over 3 years. Emphasis will be given to PIS’ current and major
products and organization. As the perception of clients is key to assessing
the effectiveness of PIS’ performance as a whole, and on production of its
main information product, Refworld in particular, the evaluation will seek to
obtain a broad spectrum of user opinions and comments, including UNHCR staff
and senior management, donors, other UN agencies, governments, NGOs, judges
and academics. At the same time, while the evaluation might not so easily
measure the impact of PIS, the impact as perceived by its clients should be
gathered and factored into the evaluation report.

3.1 Purpose and Objectives
Has PIS been able to fulfill its purpose and objectives. Is the purpose still
relevant and, if not, what should it be and how achieved?

3.2 Institutional role
What is the institutional role of PIS? What is PIS’ contribution to UNHCR? How
far is PIS mainstreamed in other UNHCR-wide programmes? Does PIS bring value-
added to the mandate and mission of UNHCR? How is PIS used or not by other
departments and sections within UNHCR? How effective has PS been at
institutional networking with other partners in the UN system (WFP, UNIEF,
UNDP, UNOCHA) and NGOs, judiciary and academics? How are PIS’ relations with
other HQs units to which certain former CDR functions were deployed, namely,
the library, archives, EPU and ESS? What should be the institutional role of
PIS?

3.3 Staffing and Management
Is PIS adequately staffed, funded and managed? With its current staffing
arrangements, is PIS capable of meeting its planning and delivery objectives?
Is it capable of sustainable, future development (refer to sustainability at
para 8).

3.4 PIS users
Who are the main users of PIS products, with what frequency and for what
reasons do they access PIS products and services? Who should be the target
audience for UNHCR protection-related information? Where do the main users of
PIS products place Refworld in the list of their most used information
products? In what ways is Refworld distinct or different than other sources of
information? Where would one go for similar information in the absence of
Refworld? What are the weaknesses of Refworld?

3.5 PIS products
How well does Refworld meet user needs, including communities of practice, in
terms of its content, means of delivery, frequency, language coverage and
cost? What has been the impact of PIS’ Refworld on its clients? Where does
Refworld rank against other related information sources? What is the value-
added of current products? Does Refworld continue to fill a relevant niche in
the information field? To what extent does it overlap with other information
providers and products?

3.6. Technology platform
How relevant is Refworld in the light of developments in communications
technology and the internet? Are there other viable and sustainable options
for dissemination of Refworld content? Should production be managed separate
from content?

3.7 Cost effectiveness
Is Refworld providing value for money? Are the costs of running PIS to produce
Refworld in line with the outputs and impact? Should users pay, or should
Refworld be free? Are current marketing, distribution, payments and accounting
systems supporting optimal income generation?

3.8 Sustainability
Is PIS able to secure income sufficient to meet its needs and to support
needed growth? What is the potential for PIS to reduce reliance on donor
funding? What other options for funding could be drawn on?

3.9 Future
Is there scope for PIS to be further expanded, or alternatively merged with
another information service? What are the options for PIS outside of DIP, and
even UNHCR?

4. Method
The evaluator will assess the above key areas through:
- Interviews with current and former CDR and Refworld staff, and those from
relevant inter-institutional units and departments.
- Interviews with UNHCR (HQs and field) staff
- Interviews with external stakeholders and clients other UN, NGOs,
governments, academics and media
- Review all internal systems and documentation
- Assess internal organization and management

5. Outputs
An initial feedback meeting, 10 March 2005, will be held by the Evaluator with
an Evaluation Committee led by EPAU before the Evaluator embarks on field
visits. The full findings of the evaluation will be presented in a written
report to include:

Full findings on all areas of assessment above and, in addition, special
emphasis on
- PIS’s accomplishments in relation to its planning.
- Findings on PIS’s client satisfaction, impact and influence.

Recommendations on how to increase impact.
- Findings and recommendations on internal organization and management
structures including staffing and resources.
- Findings and recommendations on institutional role.
- Findings and recommendations on content and platform for dissemination
- Suggestions on ways to overcome constraints faced by PIS: recruitment,
resources, content, and sustainability of its major product, Refworld.

6. Evaluator Profile
The successful candidate will possess demonstrated knowledge and experience in
two areas:

6.1 Experience in information management systems at the international level
with sound grounding in methods, information dissemination, library systems,
COI, legal databases and their evaluation, and

6.2 Experience in evaluating organizational and management structures.

7. Schedule
The evaluation will commence in March 2005, with a first draft due mid-April
2005. Findings of the first draft will be shared for comments. The final draft
is due 31 May 2005. The schedule* appears below.

(*as if the project were to start on 1 March)
ACTIVITY DATES DAYS

Phase I - Preparations
Literature Review 1-4 March 3
Develop Interview Questionnaire 4-8 March 3
Setup interview schedule 9-12 March 3
Management and structure analysis 13-23 March 10
Interviews 23-29 March 7
Evaluator presents initial findings 31 March 1

Phase II - Field Missions
Dakar 1-3 April 2
Nairobi 4-7 April 4
Washington 9-10 April 2
Ottawa 11-12 April 2

Phase III - Drafting Evaluation
Initial draft for comments 14 April 11
Final Report 31 May 8

Total 55

8. Reporting Requirements
A succinct report that includes a short executive summary of up to 2,000 words
and a main text of no more than 15,000 words. Annexes should include a list of
all persons interviewed, a bibliography, a description of the method used and
purpose of the evaluation, and a summary of survey results.

The 1st draft report is due mid-April 2005.
The final report is due 31 May 2005.

9. Payments
The Evaluator will receive 20% of the amount of the contract upon signing, 40%
upon completion of the first draft, and the last 40% upon successful
completion of the final report.

EPAU, HQEP00
UNHCR HQs
Geneva - Switzerland



**Request for Proposals:**

Evaluation of the Department of International Protection’s Protection
Information System (PIS)

1. Introduction

The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees is a programme of the United
Nations General Assembly. Its Chief Executive, the High Commissioner, is
elected by the General Assembly on the nomination of the Secretary-General and
reports to the General Assembly through the Economic and Social Council.
Within UNHCR, the Department of International Protection provides governance
and doctrine in respect of UNHCR’s mandate which is to ‘provide international
protection’ and ‘to seek permanent solutions to the problems of refugees ‘
through repatriation, local integration or resettlement. Concisely, UNHCR’s
primary purpose is to safeguard the rights and well-being of refugees.

As part of its role to oversee the Office’s primary purpose which is to
safeguard the rights and well-being of refugees, the Department of
International Protection created the Protection Information Section (PIS).
Initiated in 2001, the purpose of PIS was to backstop UNHCR’s protection role
by undertaking the provision of timely and reliable country of origin analysis
and legal reference information/materials to assist policy formulation and
decisions relating to refugee status determination. The primary tool and focus
for the dissemination of such information was to be Refworld, the CDRom
containing information on UNHCR as an organization, legal materials, national
legislation, and countries of origin originating from governments,
intergovernmental organizations, NGOs academics and courts. Refworld, created
in the mid-ninties in the former CDR, had been discontinued in 2000.

The first challenge facing the new PIS was to update the content and re-issue
it. Though a user survey of Refworld has been undertaken in 2003, a
comprehensive evaluation has not. Moreover, the last evaluation of UNHCR’s
protection information function was undertaken in respect of the Centre for
Documentation and Refugees in 1993. An evaluation of PIS and Refworld is
needed. Within UNHCR, the Evaluation and Policy Analysis Unit (EPAU) is
responsible for undertaking evaluations of operations, programmes and themes
on behalf of the organization. On the basis of the above introduction and
organizational concerns regarding the continuing usefulness of the Refworld
CDRom, the EPAU will undertake an evaluation.

EPAU is seeking proposals for an evaluation to be carried out by a single
evaluator. Proposals should include:
- CV of the evaluator.
- A clear methodology and schedule of how the evaluation will be structured
over the entire period, from 1 March to 31 May 2005, with travel to Dakar,
Nairobi, Washington and Ottawa included.
- A description of past performance in implementing external evaluations of
global information systems.
- References
- An indication of how the final report will be structured.
- A budget outline of total costs and expenses, including all travel.

2. Purpose of the Evaluation

The purpose of the evaluation will be to review PIS outputs, products,
technology and management, with special emphasis on its main product Refworld,
with a view to assessing Refworld’s relevance, efficiency, effectiveness,
value-added, impact and sustainability.

3. Timeframe

The evaluation is proposed to take place over a 4 month period, commencing
March 2005 with a first draft report for comments due mid-April 2005.

4. Call for Proposals

All those interested in submitting proposals for the evaluation of the
Protection Information Section (PIS)’s Refworld, please contact
[log in to unmask] with a proposal and budget. The deadline for submissions is 28
February 2005.

EPAU
February 2005

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Note: The material contained in this communication comes to you from the
Forced Migration Discussion List which is moderated by the Refugee Studies
Centre (RSC), University of Oxford. It does not necessarily reflect the
views of the RSC or the University. If you re-print, copy, archive or
re-post this message please retain this disclaimer. Quotations or extracts
should include attribution to the original sources.

List archives are available at: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/forced-migration.html


Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager