Ola Ana
What about the stuff which is there but is not drawn, what about the choices
made in excluding stuff?
Rachel (I used to live in Carcavelos and Lisbon a long long time ago with my
Parents)
Do you know anything about the Fundacao de Serralves near Porto?
On 27/11/05 11:24 am, "Ana Leonor Rodrigues" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hello Maulfry,
> Yes, I agree again.
> In fact these ideas touch what interests me most in drawing (when I think
> about it, not when I‚m drawing) which is an understanding of the world
> through the eyes that is active and personal and which at the same time
> becomes equally understandable (again in a personal way) to the observer of
> the drawing, both in a sensible and in a cognitive way.
> This idea of images from the inside is usually disturbing to those that
> think of the self as purely interactive. Myself I tend agree with you, as I
> have been around these thoughts for long, and because of that I once found
> in the net a paper from Paul Grobstein "From genomes to dreams"
> http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/gen_beh/Dreams.html, 1996 (quickly said) an
> investigation about the brain and if we make from new or not.
> He gave the example of dreams as thoughts and images that come from the
> inside.
>
> Back to definitions, I understand the importance of them, but they tend to
> close the possibilities of comprehend thinks if they are taken too
> seriously. For me a definition of drawing is just a beginning of a discourse
> or a conversation about drawing, as it is happening here which is very
> interesting and agreeable.
> Yours
> Ana
>
>
>
> Worthington <[log in to unmask]> escreveu:
>
>> Thanks Ana
>>
>> I like your reference to 'this mixture of precision and clarity in what is
>> presented to the eyes
>> and at the same time a kind of imprint from the self': would you agree
> that
>> drawing is also
>> some kind of imprint of what is thought of - or visualised in the brain?
>>
>> I'm thinking here that many drawings are not of something one sees - so
> must
>> draw on some
>> internal (perhaps only partly formed) images.
>>
>> Maulfry
>>
>> Maulfry Worthington & Elizabeth Carruthers
>> Children's Mathematics Network
>> Phone: 01392 682 643
>> Email: [log in to unmask]
>> [log in to unmask]
>> Web: www.e-magine.org.uk
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Ana Leonor Rodrigues" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2005 11:34 AM
>> Subject: Re: Fw: polyadic and Bakhtin -what does it mean to be original?
>>
>>
>>> Hi Maulfry
>>> I do agree so much with what you say. I also think that some of the
>>> aspects
>>> that make drawing so unique as an expression and as a communication
> system
>>> is this mixture of precision and clarity in what is presented to the eyes
>>> and at the same time a kind of imprint from the self that is always
>>> directly
>>> related to the person in a kind of remains and vestiges of bodily
>>> communication (that the subject may be aware or unaware vide: the
>>> intensity
>>> of a line for increasing drama or the trembling of a hand caused by
>>> tiredness).
>>>
>>> Ana Leonor
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ana Leonor M. Madeira Rodrigues
>>> Faculdade de Arquitectura - Universidade Técnica de Lisboa
>>> home: Av. Gago Coutinho, 25- 2º Esq.
>>> 1000-015 Lisboa
>>> T.00 351 218492924
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
|