Tim A.
This does not need clarification. I agree.
Tom
>--part1_a3.6ceab966.2f3c9241_boundary
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>Mark:
>>""Movements" have functioned equally to exclude. Max Jacob, arguably the
>best French poet of his time, and a surrealist to our eyes if ever
>there was one,
>was not allowed membership in the movement and was actively shunned. There
>are other examples. Having a name and a group helps bring attention to the
>members, but it's usually not benign."<
>
>Of course movements exclude, if you have any sort of border what is not
>included is excluded. And of course the exclusions of Surrealism were loud and
>numerous. But Surrealism was Surrealism, as a group it was Breton's,
>and it was
>not typical. It was a lot more than an artistic movement and it took
>polemics to
>a new pitch. I love the work of Max Jacob too, an astonishing poet.
>
>Tim A.
>
>
>
>--part1_a3.6ceab966.2f3c9241_boundary
>Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
><HTML><FONT FACE=3Darial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=3D2 PTSIZE=3D10>Mark:
><BR>>""Movements" have functioned equally to exclude. Max Jacob, arguably=
> the best French poet of his time, and a surrealist to our eyes if ever ther=
>e was one, was not allowed membership in the movement and was actively shunn=
>ed. There are other examples. Having a name and a group helps bring attentio=
>n to the members, but it's usually not benign."<
><BR>
><BR>Of course movements exclude, if you have any sort of border what
>is not=20=
>included is excluded. And of course the exclusions of Surrealism were loud a=
>nd numerous. But Surrealism was Surrealism, as a group it was
>Breton's, and=20=
>it was not typical. It was a lot more than an artistic movement and
>it took=20=
>polemics to a new pitch. I love the work of Max Jacob too, an astonishing po=
>et.
><BR>
><BR>Tim A.=20
><BR>
><BR></FONT></HTML>
>
>--part1_a3.6ceab966.2f3c9241_boundary--
|