JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ACCESSIBUILT Archives


ACCESSIBUILT Archives

ACCESSIBUILT Archives


ACCESSIBUILT@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ACCESSIBUILT Home

ACCESSIBUILT Home

ACCESSIBUILT  2005

ACCESSIBUILT 2005

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Questions for Canvassing BCOs

From:

John Rainey <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Accessibuilt list <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 15 Jul 2005 11:20:24 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (65 lines)

Thank you Terry for explaining your role. It is good to know that many 
Approved Inspectors do encourage designers to take access seriously and at 
an early stage.

The poser is this, if a local design guidance goes beyond part M who will 
pick this up? If as Terry says, it would be "inappropriate, unprofessional 
and unlawful" then Approved Inspectors will not. Planners usually don't look 
beyond a buildings exterior and the designers are usually unaware that a 
local guidance exists? Unless the local authority has a good Access Officer 
or Access Champion the building design will not have gained the full 
approval of local disabled people.

John


>From: Terry Warren <[log in to unmask]>
>Reply-To: Accessibuilt list <[log in to unmask]>
>To: John Rainey <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: Re: Questions for Canvassing BCOs
>Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 12:55:54 +0100
>
>Hi John and all,
>
>I'm Inclusive Design Manager for jhai - a leading national Approved
>Inspector. Regarding good practice guidance such as Manchester's Design
>for Access 2, these are for architects, designers and developers who need
>or choose to go beyond Part M standards. It would be inappropriate,
>unprofessional and unlawful for us to attempt to enforce such guidance
>where it goes beyond Building Regs.( Unlike Local Authority Building
>Control, Approved Inspectors are highly accountable to an independent
>government agency, the Construction Industry Council.)
>
>What we can do, however, is to encourage designers to take Access
>seriously at an early  stage and we advise and educate clients on DDA
>obligations and Inclusive Design. Access has been a cornerstone of jhai
>since its inception several years ago and we are probably unique amongst
>AIs in having a full-time manager (i.e. me,)to deal with complex Part M/
>DDA problems throughout the country.
>
>In response to Flick's query, re-building should not be necessary if Part
>M plan checking has been properly carried out, although I should add that
>contractors on site do occasionally screw up and yes, they are told to put
>it right if they want the building signed off!
>
>Cheers,
>Terry
>
>----------End of Message----------
>
>Run by SURFACE for more information on research, consultancy and the 
>distance taught MSc. in Accessibility and Inclusive Design programme visit:
>
>http://www.inclusive-design.it
>
>Archives for the Accessibuilt discussion list are located at 
>http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/accessibuilt.html

----------End of Message----------

Run by SURFACE for more information on research, consultancy and the distance taught MSc. in Accessibility and Inclusive Design programme visit:

http://www.inclusive-design.it

Archives for the Accessibuilt discussion list are located at http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/accessibuilt.html

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
October 2023
August 2023
June 2023
May 2023
March 2023
January 2023
November 2022
September 2022
August 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
July 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager