Hi Roger,
My original choice in the snap was between seduction and sedition. And they
can become quite close.
I didn't really want to labour this at all, but a conversation with a media
guy about what to lead out with yesterday in media clips (it was a *joke*, by
the way):
http://www.smh.com.au/news/science/why-arty-types-crave-
lust/2005/11/29/1133026469696.html
http://www.smh.com.au/news/arts/alert-and-alarmed-art-under-
fire/2005/11/28/1133026405834.html
So, yes, a snap of here at the mo'.
J
> You want to discuss sedimentation rather than seduction? My vote goes
> for seduction...
>
> On 11/30/05, Patrick Mc Manus <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > Jill Lovely but what about sedigitation or even sedimentation to amplify
> the
> > snappo
> > Luv P frozen P
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > to discuss
> > seduction, rather than
> > sedition
|