Google sucks.
(Or do suck Google?)
Some of those, Rebecca, were Google sucking good!
Stephen V
Blog: http://stephenvincent.durationpress.com
> Jeeps, jeex, jeez, we all better get a grip!
>
>
> Googlism for: suckability
>
> Sorry, Google doesn't know enough about suckability yet.
>
> However,
>
> suck is better
> suck is to save
> suck is entitled to a vacation?
> suck is written by a guest reporter who's made simple
> suck is a popular site on the internet
> suck is over
> suck is right
> suck is what suck is
> suck is to
> suck is like the web; engaging
> suck is to feed a local inn or cnews server
> suck is the much needed
> suck is a card carrying member
> suck is the middle of the afternoon or later
> suck is not very likely as long as you drive with your brain engaged
> suck is seeking a drummer
> suck is greater than this value
> suck is the measurement upon which they are based
> suck is regarded as an excellent mixed fishery
> suck is to install a new chain
> suck is a very real one and is costing our businesses big time
> suck is a concept album
> suck is at the centerpiece of the sammysoft rating system
> suck is fairly short
> suck is a set9
> suck is connected to the following things
> suck is connected to because
> suck is now an independent subsidy of hotwired
> suck is
> suck is something that happens mostly on mountain bikes that are ridden a lot
> suck is available from the barnes & noble professional
> suck is a utility which allows downloading of selected news groups to a local
> server via an nnrp feed; this is useful if your provider does not allow pull
> suck is up
> suck is a set9 productions inc
> suck is not the newsmagazine for you
> suck is that we have generalized too far in our treatment of christians
> suck is ridiculous
> suck is a term that describes a complex set of events inside the baby's mouth
> suck is ignoring a huge profit center and denying the masses their loser to
> laugh at
> suck is just a loser
> suck is on the cd as a rpm package
> suck is sold
> suck is part of automatic media
> suck is not a craft based company
> suck is a netmoguls comic pictures
> suck is dedicated to helping the newly banned through their moment of crisis
> suck is a wonderful release with many talented artists
> suck is dead and the corpse is stinking
> suck is the major issue when you experience it
> suck is using frames
> suck is a site worth learning from
> suck is some 8oo metres
> suck is located 7 miles west of conway on state 60 then
> suck is that suck is no more
> suck is clearly disapproved of
> suck is a daily e
> suck is gone
> suck is wisely purple
> suck is vercingetorix
> suck is the musical entity that is primarily piloted by the sleepwalker
> suck is right tuk
> suck is loved by everyone from rolling stone to the
> suck is based on the idea that you can learn good design by looking at bad
> design
> suck is neither a fish
> suck is present in all infants
> suck is to call attention to the horns
> suck is a singularly useful word
> suck is more than a media prank
> suck is cookin
> suck is different; he cuddles more and even pulls away during the strong flow
> of a let down
> suck is its attitude
> suck is the first movie in the history of cinema to premiere over the internet
> in
> a digital
> suck is an original online magazine of humor
> suck is a bit like that as far as web sites go
>
> Rebecca
> ---- Original message ----
>> Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 23:13:42 -0500
>> From: Mairead Byrne <[log in to unmask]>
>> Subject: Re: The suckability of contemporary American poetry
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>
>> Who the heck is Joe??? tell me!!! Help. What's happening???? Where am
>> I??
>> Is it 1999 yet??? Jeepers Creepers. What the hell's happening here????
>> Mairead
>>>>> [log in to unmask] 01/02/05 10:40 PM >>>
>> I am real lost, or this thread has lost me. For awhile I got the
>> impression
>> the focus was on suckable mints somehow conflated into a Mintie poetry
>> magazine that Mairead at some point graced, but this was after episodes
>> of
>> discussing whether or not Joe had suckered us with his parodies (during
>> which I remember falling asleep, not suckering or getting suckered by
>> any of
>> it), and now I am trying to figure out if what will come up now - under
>> the
>> 'suckability' rubric - is if we are going down some rarely chartered,
>> perhaps totally new poetrylistserv history on or as to who - among
>> poets, I
>> assume - has the ability to suck (as a negative, critical consequence in
>> his/her own poems, or as in the action of something more intimate, to
>> what
>> or whom or how, I cannot imagine), yet to talk about it as in matters of
>> content, technique, and qualities - which I guess - we, as poet tasters
>> -
>> are either already expert or will become so during the ensuing
>> discussion.
>>
>> Am I still totally off track. Whatever it is, purrhaps I am ready to
>> hear
>> it.
>>
>> Stephen V
>> Blog: http://stephenvincent.durationpress.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Ok, I'm praying too, you must be at the breaking point over
>> 'suckableness'
>>> since you misspelled your own name! so, yes, the new poetics of
>> suckability,
>>> it is, amen, amen, amen...
>>>
>>> Rebeeca
>>>
>>>
>>> ---- Original message ----
>>>> Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 21:29:38 -0500
>>>> From: Mairead Byrne <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Subject: Re: The suckability of contemporary American poetry
>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>>
>>>> Okay people I can't stand misreading that suckableness any more so
>> I'm
>>>> changing the subject line to suckability. Which sounds miles more
>>>> competent & enticing on my view, as philosophers say. Let's hope
>>>> suckability takes off, Please God please God please God....
>>>> Mairaed
>>>>
>>>>>>> [log in to unmask] 01/02/05 5:30 PM >>>
>>>> Hi Mairead,
>>>> Hey Jill Thank You! Happy New Year!
|