JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for POETRYETC Archives


POETRYETC Archives

POETRYETC Archives


POETRYETC@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

POETRYETC Home

POETRYETC Home

POETRYETC  2005

POETRYETC 2005

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Iraq & Adorno

From:

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Poetryetc provides a venue for a dialogue relating to poetry and poetics <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 27 Jun 2005 18:08:45 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (250 lines)

I find it impossible to read this piece below from The Independent (London)
today without impulsively asking, saying, "Did we (USA) have to do this?"
Let alone why or for what? This war was obviously initiated by folks who
were - based on all available and present evidence in our hands now -
("innocently" or not, crackers from the start, and remain so. Adorno's
admonition re writing lyric poetry after World War II (and one assumes
during the war) again sounds pungently clear. Unless someone takes some odd
delight in the now signature images of congealed blood on Iraq's streets and
on the floors and walls of homes, the imagined "treasures" ("democracy" or
"oil") from the masters who concocted this war will never come 'home.'
Why - with articles like this one - the likes of Bush, Rumsfeld, Cheney,
Wolfolitz, Gonzales et al are not out on their heels in disgrace remains a
scary mystery to many of us, of that I am sure. It's hard to imagine -
without sounding counter-lyrical - that this country is not headed for a
major shakeout, or, alternatively, and increasingly serious period of
Government suppression. Though the former will be painful - and no doubt
with casualties of its own kind - it (liberation from these folks) will be
radically better than being gradually or quickly victimized on all levels by
the latter.

Disgusting, disgusted.

Stephen V

Iraq: A bloody mess

By Patrick Cockburn

28 June 2005


A year ago the supposed handover of power by the US occupation authority to
an Iraqi interim government led by Iyad Allawi was billed as a turning point
in the violent history of post-Saddam Iraq.

It has turned out to be no such thing. Most of Iraq is today a bloody
no-man's land beset by ruthless insurgents, savage bandit gangs,
trigger-happy US patrols and marauding government forces.

On 28 June 2004 Mr Allawi was all smiles. "In a few days, Iraq will radiate
with stability and security," he promised at the handover ceremony. That
mood of optimism did not last long.

On Sunday the American Secretary of Defence, Donald Rumsfeld, told a US news
programme that the ongoing insurgency could last "five, six, eight, ten,
twelve years".

Yesterday in London, after meeting Tony Blair, the new Iraqi Prime Minister,
Ibrahim al-Jaafari, tried to be more upbeat, commenting: "I think two years
will be enough and more than enough to establish security".

Tonight President George Bush will make his most important address since the
invasion, speaking to troops at the US army base at Fort Bragg, North
Carolina. He is expected to seek to assure increasingly sceptical Americans
that he has a plan to prevail in Iraq, and that the US is not trapped in a
conflict as unwinnable as the one in Vietnam, three decades ago.

The news now from Iraq is only depressing. All the roads leading out of the
capital are cut. Iraqi security and US troops can only get through in
heavily armed convoys. There is a wave of assassinations of senior Iraqi
officers based on chillingly accurate intelligence. A deputy police chief of
Baghdad was murdered on Sunday. A total of 52 senior Iraqi government or
religious figures have been assassinated since the handover. In June 2004
insurgents killed 42 US soldiers; so far this month 75 have been killed.

The "handover of power" last June was always a misnomer. Much real power
remained in the hands of the US. Its 140,000 troops kept the new government
in business. Mr Allawi's new cabinet members became notorious for the amount
of time they spent out of the country. Safely abroad they often gave
optimistic speeches predicting the imminent demise of the insurgency.

Despite this the number of Iraqi military and police being killed every
month has risen from 160 at the handover to 219 today.

There were two further supposed turning points over the past year. The first
was the capture by US Marines of the rebel stronghold of Fallujah last
November after a bloody battle which left most of the city of 300,000 people
in ruins. In January there was the general election in which the Shia and
Kurds triumphed.

Both events were heavily covered by the international media. But such is the
danger for television and newspaper correspondents in Iraq that their
capacity to report is more and more limited. The fall of Fallujah did not
break the back of the resistance. Their best fighters simply retreated to
fight again elsewhere. Many took refuge in Baghdad. At the same time as the
insurgents lost Fallujah they captured most of Mosul, a far larger city.
Much of Sunni Iraq remained under their sway.

At the handover of power the number of foreign fighters in the insurgency
was estimated in the "low hundreds". That figure has been revised up to at
least 1,000 and the overall figure for the number of insurgents is put at
16,000.

The election may have been won by the Shia and Kurds but it was boycotted by
the five million Sunnis and they are the core of the rebellion. It took
three months to put together a new government as Sunni, Shia, Kurds and
Americans competed for their share of the cake. For all their declarations
about Iraqi security, the US wanted to retain as much power in its own hands
as it could. When the Shia took over the interior ministry its intelligence
files were hastily transferred to the US headquarters in the Green Zone.

To most ordinary Iraqis in Baghdad it is evident that life over the past
year has been getting worse. The insurgents seem to have an endless supply
of suicide bombers whose attacks ensure a permanent sense of threat. In
addition the necessities of life are becoming more difficult to obtain. At
one moment last winter there were queues of cars outside petrol stations
several miles long.

The sense of fear in Baghdad is difficult to convey. Petrol is such a
necessity because people need to pick up their children from school because
they are terrified of them being kidnapped. Parents mob the doors of schools
and swiftly become hysterical if they cannot find their children. Doctors
are fleeing the country because so many have been held for ransom, some
tortured and killed because their families could not raise the money.

Homes in Baghdad are currently getting between six and eight hours'
electricity a day. Nothing has improved at the power stations since the
hand-over of security a year ago. In a city where the temperature yesterday
was 40C, people swelter without air conditioning because the omnipresent
small generators do not produce enough current to keep them going. In recent
weeks there has also been a chronic shortage of water.

Some Iraqis have benefited. Civil servants and teachers are better paid,
though prices are higher. But Iraqis in general hoped that their standard of
living would improve dramatically after the fall of Saddam Hussein and it
has not.

Adding to the sense of fear in Baghdad is the growth of sectarianism, the
widening gulf between Sunni and Shia. Shia mosques come under attack from
bombers. Members of both communities are found murdered beside the road, in
escalating rounds of tit-for-tat killings.

The talks between US officials and some resistance groups revealed in the
past few days probably does not mean very much for the moment. The fanatical
Islamic and militant former Baathists and nationalists who make up the
cutting edge of insurgency are not in the mood to compromise. They are also
very fragmented. But the talks may indicate a growing sense among US
military and civilian officials that they cannot win this war.

Patrick Cockburn was awarded the 2005 Martha Gellhorn prize for war
reporting in recognition of his writing on Iraq over the past year

Then and now

Average daily attacks by insurgents

Pre-war March 2003: 0

Handover June 2004: 45

Now: 70

Analysis:

Figures should be viewed with caution because US military often does not
record attacks if there are no American casualties.

Total number of coalition troops killed

Pre-war March 2003: 0

Handover June 2004: 982

Now: 1,930

Analysis:

Number of US troops killed increased sharply during Fallujah fighting in
April and November 2004.

Iraqi civilians killed

Pre-war March 2003: n/a

Handover June 2004: 10,000

Now: 60,800 (includes 23,000 crime-related deaths)

Analysis:

Estimates of Iraqi civilian deaths have varied widely because the US
military does not count them.

Electricity supply (megawatts generated)

Pre-war March 2003: 3,958



Handover June 2004: 4,293

Now: 4,035

Analysis:

Coalition is way behind its goal of providing 6,000 megawatts by July 2004.
Most Iraqis do not have a reliable electricity supply.

Unemployed

Pre-war March 2003: n/a

Handover June 2004: 40%

Now: 40%

Analysis:

More than a third of young people are unemployed, a cause for social unrest.
Many security men stay home, except on payday.

Telephones

Pre-war March 2003: 833,000 (landlines only)

Handover June 2004: 1.2m (includes mobiles)

Now: 3.1m

Analysis:

Landlines are extremely unreliable and mobile phone system could be
improved.

Primary school access

Pre-war March 2003: 3.6m

Handover June 2004: 4.3m

Now: n/a

Analysis:

83 per cent of boys and 79 per cent of girls in primary schools. But figures
mask declining literacy and failure rate.

Oil production (barrels a day)

Pre-war March 2003: 2.5m

Handover June 2004: 2.29m

Now: 2.20m

Analysis:

Sustainability of Iraqi oilfields has been jeopardised to boost output. Oil
facilities regularly targeted by insurgents.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager