I partly wonder along with Ken, Peter. But also where the impulse came
from.
Neat. A kind of magic realism in photoshop? I was at a lecture on
'realism in the cinema' last night, where the lecturer differentiated
between 'technical realism' & 'thematic realism' & showed how they did
not necessarily connect. So that this can look 'real' (in that it is a
photo (which once upon a time meant, yes, that's what I'd see if I was
there)) & yet not be really 'real' is an interesting development of the
medium.
Doug
On 19-May-05, at 1:18 PM, Ken Wolman wrote:
> Peter Ciccariello wrote:
>
>> Thanks Ken. I appreciate you taking a look.
>> -Peter
>>
>>
> PhotoRealist forever, I ask "What is it?" For some weird reason I
> free-associate E. A. Poe. Yes, I need a day off. Really...the whole
> process of manipulating digital images fascinates me. I'm totally
> intimidated by Photoshop, which I gather is an indispensible tool for
> people who work with digital images.
>
> ken
>
> --
> Kenneth Wolman
> Proposal Development Department
> Room SW334
> Sarnoff Corporation
> 609-734-2538
>
>
Douglas Barbour
11655 - 72 Avenue NW
Edmonton Ab T6G 0B9
(780) 436 3320
Words cling to other words
As we have seen, although even these are
Migratory and the forgotten shows through as correction.
This noun has been defunct for centuries.
Ann Lauterbach
|