> with which, I must say, I mostly agree, but now --
> subsequent to this enlightening discussion -- view as ridiculously
> reductionist.)
Did you mean to say, 'deliciously' reductionist?
Or did the discussion hop some nonsensical boundary from which there is no
sensible return?
Help me out before I get 'ridiculous'!
Meanwhile not back in Conway, Connecticut but still viral,
Stephen V
|