That was Boswell, *not* Jonson. bonehead. Doh!
Roger
On 9/4/05, Roger Day <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Until revision control becomes embedded in normal usage - Word has it
> but you have to switch it on - certainly a large number of iterations
> wil be lost. Revision controls means you can revert back to the last
> time you changed a document. In gaming this is called "check-pointing
> the state", although there are more sophisticated variants of this. I
> can bore you to tears on this topic as my job is taken up with
> revision control, ensuring that the texts of the company are kept safe
> and the revisions maintained. I look forward to the day when revison
> control gets embedded in the operating system.
>
> The hard drive rarely loses it's data. It's quite difficult to lose
> your data completely even though you delete a file. To completely
> erase data requires an effort not many people outside corporations and
> govts are willing to expend. Ditto for trying to retreive data which
> has been "deleted".
>
> What they don't mention is encryption, which will become popular I
> think. So you find the data but you can't understand it as the keys
> have been lost. Or the other reason why companies delete emails: the
> threat of being sued or any legal proceedings being disrupted if your
> emails escape into the wild. Sometimes, you don't want that intimate
> conversation to be recorded.
>
> I think that the pursuit of an author will shift to archaeology. I
> predict that buying (or stealing) the PC(s) or hard-drives that have
> been used by the "rich and famous", or even moderately established,
> will become popular.
>
> Don't forget the web browsing history as well. That's always
> somewhere, and will also "reveal" something about the author and their
> work. Under current legislation, the ISP will carry logs, probably
> forever, but do you think the archaeologists of the future will be
> able to retrieve these logs? Maybe, maybe not. IRC, AIM, ICQ, Skipe,
> Voice over IP: all these are potential sources of data. So much
> information and so little time to gather it.
>
> But as Jonson discovered, finding out what an author does with his or
> hers orange peel is actually quite difficult, and the hunt maybe not
> that rewarding. Or I could invoke a form of Heisenberg's law by saying
> that the more information that you have about an author, the less you
> know him or her.
>
> Roger
>
> On 9/4/05, Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > Anyone here save their emails for those future eager biographers? Not sure
> > that I'd like anyone looking at mine -
> >
> > Best
> >
> > A
> >
> > Literary Letters, Lost in Cyberspace
> > E-Mail This
> > Printer-Friendly
> > By RACHEL DONADIO
> > Published: September 4, 2005
> >
> > Back in the 20th century, when publishers had three-martini lunches and
> > young women fresh out of Bryn Mawr became secretaries, not editors, it was
> > often lamented that the telephone might put an end to literary biography. In
> > lieu of letters, writers could just as easily gab on the phone, leaving no
> > trace.
> >
> > Today, a new challenge awaits literary biographers and cultural historians:
> > e-mail. The problem isn't that writers and their editors are corresponding
> > less, it's that they're corresponding infinitely more -- but not always
> > saving their e-mail messages.
> >
> > http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/04/books/review/04DONADIO.html?pagewanted=all
> >
> > Alison Croggon
> >
> > Blog: http://theatrenotes.blogspot.com
> > Editor, Masthead: http://masthead.net.au
> > Home page: http://alisoncroggon.com
> >
>
>
> --
> http://www.badstep.net
>
--
http://www.badstep.net
|