Helen,
I agree with everything that has hbeen said so far. It is especially
difficult to persuade landlords to do this type of work if they are not
required. Unfortunately DDA would not cover this type of place unless
things like functions were held there. From what you say it looks as though
it is just a standard common room with no access for members of the public.
Induction loops come in many and varied forms. To accommodate several
individuals it would probably require a loop covering the whole room. These
are not exactly cheap, portable systems can cost anything between £1000-4000
depending on the system and where you buy it. Across the counter loops are
cheaper, but may not give the required coverage. These cost anything
between £70-400 plus installation. If the residents requiring such a
facility were intending to buy something themselves, then, in the event that
the landlord was unwilling to have one installed, I would suggest
considering the Crescendo 20+ which is a small unit available either with
headphones or a neck loop. These can be used to follow the conversation and
do not have the restriction of only being available in the common room.
Residents would have their own personal loop and could use it anywhere
around the accommodation. These units can be purchased from connevans
http://www.connevans.co.uk <http://www.connevans.co.uk> at around £50 per
unit.
Hope this helps.
John.
John Gregory
Access Officer
Cherwell District Council
Tel. 01295 221630
Email. mailto:[log in to unmask]
<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
-----Original Message-----
From: helen kane [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 01 March 2005 23:45
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [ACCESSIBUILT] Fw: DDA and sheltered
housing
Hi Lynn,
It does all rest on the terms of the lease/tenancy agreement
. It may be
cheaper to seek advice from a management surveyor than a
solicitor (but then
I'm biased, of course). Why does the landlord object to a
loop?
Sadly, although residents may pay for works to a building
they have less
right to demand works than a landlord has to impose works
upon them (with
the exception of some critical repairs). Service charge
clauses can be very
ambiguous.
In general if a residential landlord/managing agent intends
to undertake
works in excess of a set min. amount in the block/average
per flat they are
required to serve a formal written notice granting a minimum
consultation
period. Reasonable objections must be considered. Disputes
can be taken to
tribunal.
At some point discussions involving some major works and
annual service
charge budgets are likely to take place in the common room.
You may like to
consider whether a written format notice in this case may be
considered
discriminatory, as some cannot respond, and the lack of a
loop enhances the
discrimination.
If the service charge clause says the residents have to pay
for works the
landlord and agent are likely to want a cut for organisation
and admin,
which may be a substantial amount. In this case it may be
much cheaper for
the residents to club together and install their own loop,
saving
landlord/tenant heartache and a tidy sum! Be a bit careful,
as the common
area may not belong to them, even collectively. I shouldn't
say this, but
would the landlord notice if they put a loop in?
Good luck
Helen
Access Included Ltd
>From: Lynn Jeffries <[log in to unmask]>
>Reply-To: Accessibuilt list
<[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Fw: DDA and sheltered housing
>Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 15:39:53 -0000
>
>Hi All
>
>I wondered if anyone on the list could help me with the
issues below? I
know sheltered housing and the DDA has been discussed at
some length on the
list in the past but I couldn't find anything to answer
these particular
circumstances.
>
>The communal room referred in the first scenario is used
for meetings
(social and tenants issues). There is no TV in the room.
>
>I'd be grateful for any guidance.
>
>many thanks
>Lynn
>
>"I manage an advocacy service for older people in
York (Older
Citizens
>Advocacy York - OCAY). I currently have two clients in
separate
sheltered
>blocks both owned by different property companies. In
one, the residents
>have been refused a loop system in the communal room.
This room is where
>house meetings take place and discussions are held on
many matters
including
>residents' leases. The hearing impaired are not able to
fully join in
with
>any discussions, nor hear what is being said. Decisions
are therefore
being
>made without their input.
>
>In the other block, there is no lift (and no space for
one, I believe)
and
>there are people who are becoming increasingly frail and
disabled in
first
>floor accommodation. The problem here is an obvious one
of access at the
>very least.
>
>Does the DDA have any teeth in such matters - i.e. can
the freeholders
be
>pressured to provide a loop and a stair lift? If so
would the cost be
passed
>on to the residents directly?"
>
>
>
>
>----------End of Message----------
>
>Run by SURFACE for more information on research,
consultancy and the
distance taught MSc. in Accessibility and Inclusive Design
programme visit:
>
>http://www.inclusive-design.it
>
>Archives for the Accessibuilt discussion list are
located at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/accessibuilt.html
----------End of Message----------
Run by SURFACE for more information on research, consultancy
and the distance taught MSc. in Accessibility and Inclusive Design programme
visit:
http://www.inclusive-design.it
Archives for the Accessibuilt discussion list are located at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/accessibuilt.html
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a
proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the
globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. You should not disclose its contents to any other person. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately.
Whilst the Council has taken every reasonable precaution to minimise the risk of computer software viruses, it cannot accept liability for any damage which you may sustain as a result of such viruses. You should carry out your own virus checks before opening the e-mail (and/or any attachments).
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the contents of this e-mail represent only the views of the sender and do not impose any legal obligation upon the Council or commit the Council to any course of action.
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
----------End of Message----------
Run by SURFACE for more information on research, consultancy and the distance taught MSc. in Accessibility and Inclusive Design programme visit:
http://www.inclusive-design.it
Archives for the Accessibuilt discussion list are located at http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/accessibuilt.html
|