Just dig out all the records you have and sit tight. You have six years to
put in back claims under the SFA (remember it?)
Fay
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Bromley" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 6:58 PM
Subject: Re: PGEA claims for 2003/2004
> Do we have to do anything at this stage, or should we have done it
> already??
> I am not sure if I put in for my last PGEA - I certainly submitted
> documentation after both of my appraisals, but not sure about a specific
> claim.
>
> Best wishes
>
> Paul Bromley
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: GP-UK [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Fay Wilson
> Sent: 10 March 2005 00:02
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: PGEA claims for 2003/2004
>
> No don't forget it completely. They are looking at it with their lawyers &
> I
> hope they will produce something for people to sue to see whether they
> might
> have a chance. There may well be avenues via the appeals procedure without
> going to court if the circs are similar.
>
> Fay
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul Bromley" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 11:29 PM
> Subject: Re: PGEA claims for 2003/2004
>
>
>>I take it Fay that this is therefore a 'non-starter' for the rest of us??
>> Are the GPC looking into it or do we forget it completely??
>>
>> Best wishes
>>
>> Paul Bromley
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: GP-UK [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Fay Wilson
>> Sent: 09 March 2005 22:17
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: PGEA claims for 2003/2004
>>
>> I'm advised that the doc had documentary evidence of being paid in
>> arrears
>> and the PCT had no counter-evidence that he had not. Looking at the
>> photos
>> of his desk it's easy to believe he had 15 years' worth of papers still
>> to
>> hand.....
>>
>> Fay
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Balin Graham (F81606) Harewood CO12 5AD"
>> <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 6:02 PM
>> Subject: Re: PGEA claims for 2003/2004
>>
>>
>>> We had a LMC meeting the other day and were informed that the
>>> highlighted
>>> case was unusual because the doc had taken a gap since pgea was started.
>>> Those of us paid regularly since 1990 will have no grounds for further
>>> money
>>> as the payments were _made_ in advance, based on study in _arrears_. As
>>> the
>>> payments were made in advance, they were subsumed into the global sum.
>>> No windfall then :-(
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheerio,
>>>
>>> Graham
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Paul Bromley [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>>>> Sent: 08 March 2005 23:25
>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>> Subject: PGEA claims for 2003/2004
>>>>
>>>> Regarding the article in Pulse 28th February on this one and the
>>>> successful
>>>> court case. Are you claiming from your PCT? What are the chances of
>>>> getting
>>>> the money and when is the cut-off date?? Should we not be claiming for
>>>> this
>>>> en-masse? I was with a previous PCT - I suspect I would have to try
>>>> with
>>>> them and that my chances are likely to be lower than most.
>>>>
>>>> What amount is the claim for - i.e. what proportion of the year were we
>>>> not
>>>> paid. Is the GPC doing anything for us nationally, or considering doing
>>>> anything following this ruling?
>>>>
>>>> Best wishes
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Paul Bromley
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.7.0 - Release Date: 08/03/2005
>
>
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.7.0 - Release Date: 08/03/2005
|