Dear Readers,
Institute for Law and Public Policy is glad to inform you that on January
15, 2005 the issue # 4 (49) of the Russian language journal "Sravnitel'noe
Konstitutsionnoe Obozrenie" will appear. Our journal has been published in
Russia since 1993 ("Konstitutsionnoe Pravo: Vostochnoevropeiskoe Obozrenie"
till 2003) and among its readers are justices of constitutional courts (and
another high courts), comparative constitutional law experts, researchers,
politicians from more than 30 countries. The full infomation about journal,
another publications and activities of the Institute is available at our
website: http//www.ilpp.ru
Sravnitel'noe Konstitutsionnoe Obozrenie
2004. No.4
Summaries
Special Reports
Tatyana Pryakhina
Methodological Issues in the Development of Russian Constitutional Doctrine
Constitutional doctrine is both a scientific theory and an unconventional
source of law. Seen from both sides, the author discusses methodological
challenges in the development of contemporary constitutional doctrine.
Building a constitutional model should underlie this process. The result
would be a more flexible, inclusive framework that can provide stability and
suggest ways to bridge conflicts.
Aleksey Starovoitov
Consistency in Lawmaking Activity: Factors, Tendencies and Problems
The author describes the planning, forecasting and programming of
legislative activity in developed nations, each with a different form of
government and legal code. Stages of development and problems with planning
or forecasting often characterize transitional economies. The author
suggests ways to improve longterm forecasting by introducing new scientific
methods. The goal is to make the different stages of development consistent
with political contexts and financial resources.
Aleksey Avtonomov
Consensual Integration and the Essence of Contemporary Federalism
There are two opposing trends in the current world context. One is the
formation of new federations and the other is their dissolution. This
simultaneity of events can be traced back to the ideology that underlies
contemporary federalism. The author discusses the relation between
federalism and democracy, as well as two determinant factors: the role of
economic conditions and their impact on collectivist dynamics. The article
demonstrates how real federalism is possible (and efficient) provided that
social conditions are in place for the integration of politically and
economically active groups.
Thomas Remington
Democratization, Separation of Powers and State Capacity in Russia
To what extent can Russian legislators control the executive bureaucracy?
Does legislation passed in parliament clash with presidential decrees or
does it tend to complement it? How do the legislative and executive branches
interact when they draw up the government budget? By using examples from
contemporary Russia, the author looks at this type of issues.
Nikolay Mironov
Institutionalization of the Political Opposition
The author examines the parliamentary opposition in Russia. In 2004, the
State Duma (Lower House of parliament) ceased to honor a federal law
granting legal rights to opposition activities. This was in response to
President Putin’s personal rejection of the law. The author discusses the
basis for a new draft law governing the legal status of opposition groups in
Russia. The adoption of the draft law would help institutionalize the
political opposition in parliament. According to the author, this type of
legislation is one of the pillars of rule of law in modern democratic
states.
Sofia Simonian
Procedural Guarantees for Citizens Requiring Psychiatric Assistance
The paper looks at the novelties in Chapter 35 of the Russian Federation’s
Code of Civil Procedure. This chapter establishes the procedures to be
followed in cases requiring psychiatric hospitalization, as well as
obligatory psychiatric examinations. Such provisions did not exist in the
previous Code of Civil Procedure. The rules regarding forced psychiatric
care were established in “On the psychiatric assistance and guarantees of
civilian rights at the time of their administration”, a law approved on July
2, 1992. The author alludes to contradictions between statements in this Law
and the norms in Chapter 35 of the new code. The issue of legal nature in
such cases is also considered.
Feature:
The Right to Euthanasia
Renata Uitz
Facing the Unexpected On the Margins of the Hungarian Constitutional Court
Decision on Euthanasia
In 2003, the Constitutional Court handed down its judgment on
physicianassisted suicide (euthanasia). A unanimous Court found that active
euthanasia was not unconstitutional per se, but a divided Court upheld the
rules limiting passive euthanasia. In light of highprofile international
rulings, this article looks at new opportunities to reconsider the legal
norms regulating physicianassisted suicide in Hungary.
Zoltan Szente
Interpretation of the Constitution: Ethic and Pragmatic Aspects. Comments on
the Decision of the Hungarian Constitutional Court
Regarding Euthanasia
This analysis does not discuss so much the moral aspects surrounding
euthanasia as much as the procedural aspects in the Hungarian Constitutional
Court. Did the Court act rightly and consistently? Can its interpretive
methods be justified? The scrutiny extends to constitutional doctrines
applied by the Court, with special attention devoted to the right of human
dignity. Also included are issues such as selfdetermination of life and the
proportionalitynecessity test.
Methodology of Comparative Constitutionalism
Helmuth SchulzeFielitz
Comparative Constitutional Law: Is It a Oneway Street? The Principle of
Dignity in Biomedical Research
According to the author, Russian constitutional law lags behind private
practice in its use of comparative methodology. The article discusses some
reasons for this phenomenon in an attempt to encourage the use of a
comparative approach to issues of public and constitutional law. Cases of
biomedical ethics in Germany serve to illustrate the author’s position.
Gunther Frankenberg
Critical Comparison: an Attempt to Enliven Comparative Law
The author offers an overview of comparative legal studies to examine
whether they are relevant to the aims stated by “comparativists”. To this
end he looks at the two main approaches: “comparisonplus” and comparative
functionalism. He classifies the official positions into ideal types and
paradigms. The author casts doubts about the legitimacy of objects in
comparative legal research. By criticizing the attitude of
comparativistsfunctionalists, he proposes a new way of reaching objectivity
in comparative studies. The new approach involves a more critical
understanding of scientific issues.
Council of Europe
Irina Yatsenko, Vadim Pak
Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights Concerning Fiscal
Disputes
The article provides an insight into the practice of the European Court of
Human Rights in the field of taxation. Despite its restrained competence,
the Court is empowered to carry out both substantive and procedural review
of the State fiscal actions. The authors summarize the exact meaning of the
Convention standards applied by the Court in the sphere, taking particular
account of the latest trends of the Court’s caselaw.
Judicial Power in Russia
Vladimir Pastukhov
The Russian Justice: “Separation from the Power” Basic Directions to
Overcome the Crisis of the Judicial System
The article demonstrates that the judicial system in Russia still requires a
fullscale reformation, which should include a comprehensive revision of the
procedural codes currently in force, performed not only by the judges
themselves. The author figures out several specific issues which determine
the inefficiency and corruption of the Russian jurisprudence. This detailed
elaboration of the problems of the judicial system allows him to suggest
practical ways to their solving.
Tamara Morschakova
The Constitutional Protection of the Rights and Freedoms of Citizens by
Courts in the Russian Federation
The author suggests a wide interpretation of the term “the constitutional
protection”. She includes into the latter the protection of rights not
explicitly listed in the Constitution, in particular, those established by
supranational acts. The Constitutional Court should become a custodian of
the international legal standard concerning human rights and freedoms. The
paper discusses also the questions related to involving the courts of all
levels into the constitutional protection and to the wide interpretation of
the means of this protection.
Tatyana Neshataeva
Court and Protection of the Citizens’ Rights and Freedoms
The paper is devoted to a discussion of necessity of changes in the judicial
system of contemporary Russia. These changes should aim at providing
adequate judicial defense of human rights and freedoms. The author analyzes
this question from the point of view the international law. In particular,
the drawbacks of the judicial system are considered, which were pointed out
in the practice of the European Court on Human Rights. Among them there
present serious shortcomings of procedural mechanisms of justice: violation
of the principle of equality of judges, phenomena of corporativeness and
conservatism (keeping the habits of the previous profession by a judge).
Grigory Yermoshin
Judicial Community in Russia in the Context of Contemporary Reality
The subject of this paper is the legal state and the role of the judicial
community in contemporary Russia. Two basic functions of the bodies of the
judicial community are highlighted, both directly related to the
organization and activity of the judicial power: participation in solving
the problems related to its financing and solving the staffrelated
questions. The status of the qualifying boards of judges and other bodies of
the judicial community is discussed and analyzed on the basis of practical
examples.
Elena Abrosimova
Selfregulation of the Judicial Power: the Basics, the Content, the Trends
Though the principle of the separation of powers is widely acknowledged,
judicial power institutes often lawmaking. The author considers this
phenomenon taking the RF as an example. She discusses the rulings of the
Supreme Court, the Higher Arbitration Court and the Constitutional Court of
the RF (which became the real sources of law) as well as the decisions of
the managing institutes and other mechanisms by which judicial power
participates in the legislative process – the adoption of the norms of
judicial order, the acts of the bodies of the judicial community (in
particular, those related to the qualification of judges), the right to the
legislative initiative. Application of the latter is subject to a critical
discussion in the paper.
Russian Reforms and Consolidation of the Legislation
Andrey Medushevsky
Administrative Reform in Contemporary Russia
Administrative reform – is one of priorities for the transitional economics
in Russia. The essence of reform is to construct the administrative
mechanism and rational bureaucracy for the effective and transparent
governance. Examining the legislative basis of reform, its stages and
different strategies, the author demonstrates the contribution of a new
legislation in terms of both institutions and administrative practices. He
argues the contradiction between the role of the state in forming of market
economy and the enforcement of the institution of private property from the
one hand and the negative regulatory role of public organs in restraining of
private interest and the creation of administrative barriers for business
from the other. This analysis shows the importance of separation of
different institutional functions in order to prevent overcentralization
and stimulate the optimization of control. The implementation of a new
legislation on administrative service reflected a structural conflict of
interests between branches of government, central and regional bureaucracy,
ruling elite and big business.
Irina Kalinina
State Liability for Caused Damage
The paper discusses some issues concerning the legal nature of state
liability for caused damage, as well as judicial approaches (mainly of
arbitrage courts) to some elements that constitute the state obligation to
compensate the damage. The attention is paid to the interpretation of some
of these elements in a light of constitutional nature of state liability: in
particular, the author underlines the idea of strict liability, i.e. state
liability somewhat more independent from fault and other subjective factors.
Oleg Mozgo
Development of the Antimonopoly Legislation in Russia
The paper considers basic trends in the development of the antimonopoly law
in Russia in 2000–2004. After a brief review of the principal novelties in
the Law “On the concurrence and the limitations of monopolistic activity on
the goods market”, the author turns to the analysis of recent administrative
practice of the Ministry of antimonopoly policy and to characteristics of
the development of jurisprudence on the related cases. The issues of
regulation of natural monopolies and possible future developments of the
antimonopoly law are also considered.
Constitutional Foundations of Criminal Procedure
Alla Vereschagina
The Constitutional Bases of the Criminal Procedure Legislation in Russia
(Several Aspects)
The author presents a critical analysis of the new code of Criminal
Procedure of Russia from the point of view of the constitutional principles
and provisions. Several aspects of external and internal independence of the
judicial power are considered, both those which have found their place in
the new code and those which await its further editions. Constitutional
provisions determined the concept of the code; they influenced its
structure, manner of exposition and appearance of some novelties.
Simultaneously some old procedural institutes are still kept. This means
that the document has a transitional nature and points to a necessity of its
further development.
Peter Solomon
The Criminal Procedure Code of 2001: Will it Make Russian Justice More Fair?
This paper scrutinizes the UPK of 2001 and its initial implementation. Using
official statistics and materials from the Monitoring project, it assesses
the impact of the Code on the conduct of trials and pretrial investigations.
Consideration is also given to the novel Monitoring project and its
contribution to the Code’s implementation. The paper argues that while the
Code made trials more adversarial, it failed to remove accusatorial bias
from the pretrial phase.
Constitutional Review
Alexandra Troitskaya
The Constitutional Duty to Pay Taxes and Fees as Reflected in the Rulings of
the Russian Constitutional Court
It is an important task to ensure a balance between opposite interests of
the state and the taxpayer when the duty to pay taxes is established. The
author analyses the practice of the Constitutional Court of the RF on the
cases related to taxation. It is emphasized that the Court, when considering
these cases, relies not only on the provisions of the corresponding article
of the Constitution (Art.57), but, to a great extent, on the constitutional
principles. In this way, the Court aspires to ensure the conformity of the
tax system with the basic ideas of the Constitution.
To get the fourth issue or to effect the subscription to "Sravnitel’noe
Konstitutsionnoe Obozrenie" (ISSN 1812-7126), please, address to
Ekaterina Lazareva
Office-Manager
Institute for Law and Public Policy
tel: 7 (095) 928 00 20 or 564 86 83
fax: 7 (095) 921 07 33
?-mail: [log in to unmask]
Address for visitors: 101000, Moscow, ul.Maroseika, 9/2, bl.8, office 34
or to one of the partners of JSC «MK-Periodica» in your country or to JSC
«MK-Periodica» directly.
Address: Russia, 129110 Moscow, Gilyarovskogo Street, 39, JSC «MK-Periodica»
Tel.: 7 (095) 681 9137; 681 8747
Fax: 7 (095) 681 3798
E-mail: [log in to unmask]
http://www.periodicals.ru
Yours sincerely,
Olga Valueva
Managing Editor, SKO
Institute of Law and Public Policy
tel. 7 (095) 928-00-20
fax 7 (095) 921-07-33
?-mail: [log in to unmask]
|