The Disability-Research Discussion List

Managed by the Centre for Disability Studies at the University of Leeds

Help for DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH  December 2004

DISABILITY-RESEARCH December 2004

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Invisible disabilities and the disability card

From:

David Quarter <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

David Quarter <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 31 Dec 2004 09:57:36 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (166 lines)

Priority:               normal
Date sent:              Thu, 30 Dec 2004 11:11:49 +0000
Send reply to:          Mitzi Waltz <[log in to unmask]>
From:                   Mitzi Waltz <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:                Re: Invisible disabilities and the disability card
To:                     [log in to unmask]

> David qrote:
> >Mental so-called illness and brain damage are distinguishable.
> >There are certainly brain illnesses (such as Alzeimer), and then
> >there is clinical depression, OC so-called D, manic depression,
> >etc. People with the latter 'ailments' are not sick, in the sence in
> >having something psysiologically wrong with them. You don't die
> >from OCD, manic depression, or scizophrenia. This is not to say
> >that the poeple experiencing these 'problems' aren't in a fair amount
> >of distress. But it certainly not like Alzeimers which will eventually
> >kill you.
>
> I beg to differ, David. Manic depression, in particular, can and does kill--through suicide, drug and alcohol abuse,
> and manic-state-induced accidents.>>>>

  As you can see above, my point was regarding the source of the
two. Physiological vs social construction. I grant you the point that
people who display  manic depressive tendencies do engage in
potentionally deadly behaviour, but is it not -- I'm sorry to say -- the
manic depression per se that kills someone. Cancer, if not treated,
will cause someone to die. People may or may not die from manic
induced behaviours. Tumours can be located.  Where are the
manic depressive lesions? Also if someone displays reckless
behaviour that causes death -- I imagine it's one the leading causes
of deaths in western societies -- does that mean that there is such
a thing as "reckless disorder"?



 It has an incredibly high death rate (suicide will claim 1 in 10 people with
> bipolar disorder)>>>>

 Yes people wtih manic behaviour commit suicide at a high than
average rate. B/c drugs are  prescibed to just about every person
given a psychiatric label, I would argue that it's very difficult to
conclusively determine that it is the so called illnes that  is the
cause of the suicidical behaviour. There is a ton of evidence
pointing to the suicidal role of  psychiatric drugs. I don't need to be
lectured about this either as tried killing about 7 times while on
SSRIs and related drugs. I've never tried once since being off the
'meds'.


 perhaps it's just hard for someone who hasn't experienced it>>>>
or cared for someone else who
> does>>>>


 Predicable knee-jerk reaction.


 I always find it amusing when people automatically assume that
because someone doesn't share the same opinion on a matter or
another that they feel particularly strongly about that it is because
somehow  the person hasn't personally been affected by the  issue.


 to see the connection between the condition and the level of risk. As someone who has had to prevent a
> loved one from jumping from a moving car, dealt with drug overdoses and alcohol abuse and suicide attempts
> brought on by trying to cope with truly horrific suffering, and seen first-hand the physical side of bipolar disorder
> and OCD (in the individual's case that I am closest to, this includes serious hormonal problems, sensory issues that
> can be quite painful, pain from hypermobile joints, and more),I'm constantly frustrated that some folks continue to
> insist that it's *purely* a social construct. >>>>>

 For your informatiom,  I was diagnosed with OCD about 14 years
ago. I have dealt with depression most of my life. I was also
institutionalized 3 times in the past. I have undergone councelling
for most of my life. I have a mother on SSRIs. I have an aunt with
so-called bi polar disorder. I have another aunt with OC tendencies
and an uncle who displays the same behaviours. I had a friend with
severe form of so0-called agrophobia (or whatever it's called)  I
volunteer for two agencies for people with mental health issues. I
am a member of organization for psych. survivors working to
dismantle the system. I think I'm just as qualified as the next
person to speak on the issue.


Actually, the current social construct of mental illness tends to deny any
> connection between physical symptoms and "mental" symptoms, basically denying that the brain is an organ of the
> body>>>>

 I would draw the distinction between the brain and the mind...



and causing additional distress to those who experience both types of symptoms, as well as stigmatising the
> different ways of thinking and behaving involved.>>>>

 Please provide an example of this "stigmatising"?



> I would also note that there is a good deal of evidence for a physiological basis to most "mental illnesses">>>>

 bollocks!     I am quite aware of the psychiatric literature Madame,
to the point that I will quite confidentally state that your statement
is 100% false. There is such a  "Good deal of evidence" that THE
authoritative publication of diagnostic criterion -- the DSM --
continues to specify that ONLY SYMPTOMS should be the basis
on which so-called mental illness is determined. Do you homework
before you lecture me!  I did a thorough investigation of all of the
DSM publications including the more recent DSM-IV-R and I can
tell you that in each of the Forwards to the publications, there is a
satement to the effect that: "the actual cause of the mental illness
is still unknown". They've been saying the same thing for over 50
years!



 -- which
> I put in quotes here not because I doubt that they are real, but because I believe that they are illnesses, not some
> kind of social construct from which someone can simply pull themselves up by their bootstraps (the right-wing
> view, if you will, which still stigmatises the individual with the label) or that would no longer be problematic to the
> people who carry these labels if only society was more accepting (the left-wing view, if you will, which denies that
> there is any suffering from the symptoms themselves).>>>>

 The issue for me is not so much the behaviour. I don't question
that I display Obsessive Compulsive tendencies. What I DO
question is whether my behaviour should be put under a
miscoscope, that I should be given the extremely stigmatizing label
that, as much as I would love to, I can NEVER shake off, that
perpetually defines me as "ill", as helpless, as an unfortunate sole.

If you think that calling someone mentally ill is flattering thing, you
need a severe reality check.

I can tell you that there isn't day in my life that I consider divulging
to the world that I have so-called OCD. And I have spoken to many
people who swallow the medical line hook, line and sinker who
acknowledge  feeling similar stigma.

Despite what you believe, they aren't any better off for being labeled
with an "illness" that, for better or for worse, will never be cured.



That's not to say that our society is not quick to slap a
> medical label on someone who is suffering not from mental illness, but from the effects of poverty, abuse, trauma,
> discrimination, etc. all of which can harm the mind (as well as the body) and which will not respond to medical
> treatment because they are social phenomena. It's also not to say that we have anything approaching appropriate
> medical treatment for the medical aspects, or an appropriate social model of mental illness that takes into account
> the effects of stigma, discrimination, or inappropriate medicalisation.>>>


 Can' t you make the connection between "stigma" and an
associated label? Do you think people automatically realize  I
"have"  a so-called mental illness?


DOQ

________________End of message______________________

Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List
are now located at:

www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html

You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager