I'm not entirely sure what our image is, and in theory yes it is a
consumerist construct.
but the idea of a psychologist being specifically linked with a brand
is saying something.
some people may think it's a good idea, some consider it a money
spinner, others may not care, but I suspect for some people it is a
problem.
PB
---- Original Message ----
From: [log in to unmask]
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: psychologists and 'branding'
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 16:53:06 EST
>In a message dated 16/12/2004 20:15:37 GMT Standard Time,
>[log in to unmask] writes:
>
>I guess I'm concerned about the image
>this gives to psychology,
>one wonders what our "image" is. surely image is also a consumerist
>construct?
>Craig
>
>
>
>___________________________________
>
>COMMUNITYPSYCHUK - The discussion list for community psychology in
>the UK.
>To unsubscribe or to change your details visit the website:
>http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/COMMUNITYPSYCHUK.HTML
>For any problems or queries, contact the list moderator at d.m.fryer@
>stir.ac.uk
___________________________________
COMMUNITYPSYCHUK - The discussion list for community psychology in the UK.
To unsubscribe or to change your details visit the website:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/COMMUNITYPSYCHUK.HTML
For any problems or queries, contact the list moderator at [log in to unmask]
|