On Mon, 18 Oct 2004, Norman Gray wrote:
> I'd like to make the parsecon component a convenience library for
> subpar, and thus remove it from the public API of PCS. Is this
> obviously a bad idea?
sounds good to me.
> I believe this will be OK, since the only component Makefile.am which
> refers to parsecon_link_adam is parsecon itself, and the only
> *_link_adam script which refers to -lparsecon_adam is subpar's. This
> if I simply add all of parsecon to the subpar library, everything
> should be OK.
rather than moving all the parsecon routines to subpar, one idea would be
to make pcs a single component and then build the subpar library out of
the parsecon and subpar sublibraries using LIBADD...
--
Tim Jenness
JAC software
http://www.jach.hawaii.edu/~timj
|