> > > > > The pcs/string libraries are not installed,
> > > >
> > > > *scratch head*
> > > >
> > > > Shouldn't typing "make" in pcs/ build the pcs/string/ library?
> >
> > No -- pcs isn't a component directory, so the make targets in there
> > aren't much more than dummys. Their real function is to allow the
> > bootstrapping to be percolated into the child directories.
>
> I still don't agree with this. PCS should really be PCS rather than
> lots of tiny packages. [and it makes the subpar problem hard to fix for
> shared libraries]
I think I agree with Tim, typing "make" in the pcs/ directory should make
everything in the subdirectories, it's totally counter-inuitive that it
doesn't.
Al.
|