>Maybe she really did say it. But the fact that the quote was reproduced in
>several other news sources is not very good evidence that she was _not_
>misquoted. These outfits borrow each others' sources, I think. The fact that
>they use the very same wording is evidence that they did not independently
>check with Ms. Rarus to get the quotation. I don't know Rarus, and I have no
>reason to defend her, but if she was misquoted once it's quite possible that
>the misquote was perpetrated by other news organizations.
I agree. Nancy Rarus is apparently deaf herself (BA Gallaudet):
http://www.nad.org/site/pp.asp?c=foINKQMBF&b=187078
There could have been a misquotation or mistranslation (relay
operator or terp) here. To me, a deaf staff member at the NAD making
such a statement is a bigger story than a deaf couple wanting a deaf
child.
I guess I forgot to introduce myself since I'm new to the list. I'm
a temporarily able-bodied political and cultural anthropologist who
does work around disability politics in Japan. My dissertation was on
deaf social movements there in the post-war period, and I'm currently
doing research on categories of emerging disabilities.
Karen Nakamura
Macalester College
--
________________End of message______________________
Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List
are now located at:
www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.
|