On Mon, 18 Oct 2004, Huw Jenkins wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Oct 2004, Rasmus Fogh wrote:
>
> > Dear Huw,
> >
> > If we are talking about copying to a completelty new project, this could
> > presumably be done. If nothing else you could load in the entire
> project,
> > delete the bits you did not want, and save it somewhere else. Copying
> into
> > an existing project is effectively FormatConverter territory - how do
> > you map the copied resonsnces to the existing ones?
>
> Yep that was what I meant.
>
> > But why would you want to have your titrations in a new Project in the
> > first place? If you want to share data, surely the simplest way is to
> have
> > everything in a single project? Can you tell a bit more about the
> > situation you imagine?
>
> I agree this does make sense - but only if it doesn't affect the start-up
> time of analysis. Currently when using ansig I have different setups (ie
> .ctr and .ini) files for different things such as NOESY assignment,
> aromatic assignment, and also for titration series. This is primarily due
> to the 8 spectra limit but also it means I don't have to read in all my 3D
> data everytime I open ansig to say assign n-hsqc peaks in a
> titration.
>
Point well taken - we would have to see. It is true in both cases that the
more you have to load, the longer it will take, but the times and effects
are different for Analysis and Ansig. In Ansig loading the contours took
a lot of the time. In Analysis loading the contours takes essentially zero
time (they are drawn as needed) and the main problem would be if you had
*lots* of peak lists.
Wim and Tim are thinking about possible solutions for your questions.
Meanwhile, if you try it out you might be lucky and find that you can have
it all in one project without slowing things down unreasonably.
Try it and see?
Yours,
Rasmus
|