Then I repeat as I have before that I assert individual authors copyright
over every communication to this list and that was always my right, you do
not have copyright all you are assuming is licence to use and quote, which
is not the same thing.
Please consider that at some time in the future I may indeed institute civil
proceedings to test that right if it has been violated by the use of my
archived material in ways I do not permit so be warned.
It is one thing quoting within the conventions of email and archiving that,
again as a limited licence, another to assume all future rights over that
material, even Yahoo has been dragged through the courts on that one.
So again either people respect my right to privacy within this list and do
not quote me without requesting permission or if I find out I have been
published elsewhere I shall seek legal redress.
This is important to me as part of my critique of academia, let alone
disability studies is the cavalier way in which academics seem to stand
above common courtesies and respect for the individual who is to them no
more than a subject for reserch not a person deserving of rights.
Your last email has clearly demonstrated this to me beyond any doubt.
Larry
> -----Original Message-----
> From: The Disability-Research Discussion List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Mark Priestley
> Sent: 07 September 2004 14:03
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: copyright policy
>
>
> Hi
>
>
> Yes and no... in practice that's basically correct. There are two types
> of use:
>
> Primary use: When list members receive messages from the list (i.e. not
> sent to them individually) they may forward them to other individuals or
> lists and quote from them in subsequent conversations (with due
> permission and acknowledgement). Most email software automatically
> quotes the original message anyway, so we are all quoting all the time.
>
> Secondary use: All list messages are archived for public display on the
> list webpage (unless removed by the service provider). This web page,
> like any other web page, is a public internet reference source that may
> be quoted (with due permission and acknowledgement).
>
> Our assumption in both cases is that the author grants permission
> (implied licence) for publication on these terms every time they send a
> message to the list (rather than sending one privately to an
> individual). By default, your reply does not go to the list if you just
> hit the 'reply' button. Posting to the public list is therefore a
> purposeful act of consent to list policy.
>
> All messages to this list are published material (published in the UK
> and subject to UK law). They are not private correspondence. It is as
> though you were sending a letter for publication to a newspaper. You
> have the right to state in your message that you don't wish to be
> quoted, but if you don't wish to be quoted then you would be well
> advised not to post to a published source!
>
> NB: all the above relates to our 'open' (public) list - you should never
> quote or forward any mail from a 'closed' (private) list or from private
> correspondence without express written authority.
>
> Hope that helps
>
> Best wishes
>
> Mark
>
________________End of message______________________
Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List
are now located at:
www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.
|