Another item for the agenda could be Pete's statement of problem
regarding DCMI Point/Box/Period [1]
Tom
[1] http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=ind0407&L=dc-architecture&T=0&F=&S=&P=198
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 08:20:05AM +0100, Andy Powell wrote:
> My thoughts are to use the time to focus on finalising the Abstract Model.
> In order to do this I will prepare two documents:
>
> - an updated (and hopefully close to final) version of the abstract model
> working draft
>
> - an updated list of issues. Note that the issues list that I prepared
> for the last Usage Board meeting is at
>
> http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/dcmi/dc-usage/am-issues/
>
> We could also possibly spend some time going over the possibilities for
> clarifying the resource vs. literal issue in the RDF encodings (should
> DCMI recommend the use of strings or resources or both (as currently) as
> the values of DCMI properties?). If we do want to tackle this, then it
> might be useful if people tabled short position papers (by email) on what
> they think is the best way forward.
>
> Finally, if the right people are around, it might be useful to get an
> update on where the W3C work on embedding RDF in XHTML has got to... since
> at some point this work will presumably have an impact on the currrent
> DCMI recommendation for embedding DC into HTML.
--
Dr. Thomas Baker [log in to unmask]
Institutszentrum Schloss Birlinghoven mobile +49-160-9664-2129
Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft work +49-30-8109-9027
53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany fax +49-2241-144-2352
Personal email: [log in to unmask]
|