Tim,
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004, Tim Stevens wrote:
> This is a 'feature', i.e. how Wayne and I wanted things, but I can see
> how this may be going against some traditional grain.
>
> In our resonance-centric world, we believe that the user should go to 108
> ppm if the shift is at 108 ppm. Because you can tile spectra (in spectrum
> referencing set min and max ppm values) you can navigate between spectra
> with different spectral widths and always find contours.
I can see your reasoning. However, I think that tiling is some way from
being fully useful (no +ve/-ve contour alternation in tiles, increased
overhead of drawing extra contours, user confusion, etc.) and for some
cases is never going to be the handiest way of doing things. Your
argument works if the function was "following" a resonance, but it's not,
it's "following" a peak object. I would consider that since the peak knows
that it belongs to a particular spectrum and also knows whether it's
aliased, "following" a peak should take you to the bit of data that
allowed the peak to be picked in the first place.
Brian
--
Dr. Brian O. Smith ---------------------- B.Smith at bio.gla.ac.uk
Division of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology,
Institute Biomedical & Life Sciences,
Joseph Black Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.
Tel: 0141 330 5167/6459 Fax: 0141 330 8640
|