Impressive. What's your hourly rate?
Date sent: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 20:09:15 +0100
Send reply to: ColRevs <[log in to unmask]>
From: ColRevs <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: respect for research
To: [log in to unmask]
>>>>><<<<<. I remain interested in
solid
> research, done by qualified researchers who use rigorous standards of
> controls for testing.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "ColRevs" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: "Nancy Lane" <[log in to unmask]>;
<[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2004 11:21 AM
> Subject: Re: Info about the purpose of this list needed
>
>
> > Nancy said....Some of the sites suggested in these many posts do not
> contain
> > any responsible or scientific
> > research done by qualified researchers.
> >
> >
> > My reply... So then, Nancy... who do you believe which research we
should
> > trust by so called 'qualified researchers, who believe they are 'right'
> and
> > others are wrong?
> >
> >
> > Sorry for filling your email box up, but I have got idea how to solve
> this.
> > If you don't want to open your mind to 'new' post-modern research an you
> are
> > stuck in the anal-retentive state of the enlightenment period and
> modernity
> > project, from research theories that has caused so much suffering and
pain
> > towards humanity and wars, then that your choice.
> >
> > You can always just 'press' your 'delete' button on your key-board or
> > instruct your 'voice' activated software to 'delete' it for you.
> >
> > Once again I apologise if I have caused you and your computer harm by my
> > emails today. This was not my intent. I just wanted to empower others
and
> I
> > though I was doing some good.
> >
> > You can't seem to win in this global 'cyber' world can you?
> >
> > As the they... 'you can't please some people all of the time, but you
> can't
> > please others some of the times.'
> >
> > Sorry Nancy, for not pleasing you with my-own research information this
> > time.
> >
> > Take-Care
> >
> > Colin
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Nancy Lane" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2004 4:06 PM
> > Subject: Info about the purpose of this list needed
> >
> >
> > > I joined this discussion group for broad discussion on the reasearch
> going
> > > on in disability studies. Instead I am assaulted by 20, 20!! emails
from
> > one
> > > person this morning on autism. Three of them were marked high priority
> > > although I could not detect any reason for the alert. Some of the
sites
> > > suggested in these many posts do not contain any responsible or
> scientific
> > > reasearch done by qualified researchers.
> > >
> > > Perhaps the moderator could explain the purpose of the list if I have
> > > misunderstood so I can decide whether I want my in box filled with
> > > unnecessary or irrlevant posts.
> > >
> > > Thank you.
> > >
> > > Nancy Lane, Ph.D.
> > >
> > > ________________End of message______________________
> > >
> > > Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List
> > > are now located at:
> > >
> > > www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
> > >
> > > You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.
> > >
> > >
> >
>
____________________________________________________________________________
> > > This email and all attachments have been scanned by Kingston
> > Communications'
> > > email Anti-Virus service and no known viruses were detected.
> > >
> >
>
____________________________________________________________________________
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
________________End of message______________________
Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List
are now located at:
www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.
________________End of message______________________
Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List
are now located at:
www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.
|