Alessandra, if you do this you can't really say you are making the
resources available to the Grid, can you? I take it this isn't a cluster
that you proposed as part of the Tier2 to get your GridPP Tier2 staffing.
John
On Sun, 8 Aug 2004, Alessandra Forti wrote:
> > What exactly do you want to achieve?
>
> I just wanted to publish a local queue that is not available to all the
> VOs, but only to local users independently from the VO they belong which
> has a higher precedence than any other VO queue. If the job doesn't look
> like as coming from the UI but only from the RB certainly this is useless.
> Restricting to the local users DNs can become cumbersome.
>
> thanks
>
> cheers
> alessandra
>
>
> On Fri, 6 Aug 2004, Burke, S (Stephen) wrote:
>
> > Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes
> >> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Alessandra Forti said:
> >> Can the value of GlueCEAccessControlBaseRule be *.hep.man.ac.uk or
> >> something similar?
> >
> > Not usefully. What exactly do you want to achieve? The jobs will always come
> > from the RB, how could you tell which UI they came from? What you could do
> > is restrict access to the certificates of local users. It used to be the
> > case that the AccessControlBaseRule was a list of explicit DNs. I would
> > think that support for that is still there, although I don't know, so you
> > could try that.
> >
> > Stephen
> >
>
|