Larry
I think that Colins comment valid because of your previous remark, to identify at least two examples of poor research references to support your blanket observation.
Keith
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 18:40:36 +0100 , Larry Arnold <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>I thought I had already explained the need for skepticism in previos posts,
>I have other work to do besides ansering every post with a long rebuttal.
>
>Larry
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: The Disability-Research Discussion List
>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of ColRevs
>> Sent: 23 August 2004 18:38
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: Info about the purpose of this list needed
>>
>>
>> Larry
>> Just point out IYHO, which research I have sent is bad and biased science?
>> Enlighten me and other more on this/Is not all science
>> ideologically biases.
>> Who telling 'the-truths'?
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Colin
--
War makes people ill.
___________________________________________________
Cost effective technology solutions for business. Sign up for a free trial today!
http://www.officemaster.net
________________End of message______________________
Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List
are now located at:
www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.
|