> > > Also, what does #cpu(i386) mean? #cpu isn't a directive. I think
> > > this
> > > is just a hopelessly garbled line. What's it supposed to mean?
> >
> > Just to clear this up, #cpu is a valid GCC-ism, so the code should
> > really
>
> I stand corrected! And the cpp syntax does appear to allow for "#
> <non-directive>" sequences within skipped text.
Goes to show!
Al.
|