Andy Heath wrote:
> An issue here for me is accessibility.
> If we had made all the decisions (we're close)
> I could then look at the proposed mandatory elements list and
> see how it matched up.
> My report to CEN-ISSS WS-LT on this is due the end of July.
> If someone on here also on aplr (a few people are)
> wanted to take on responsibility to see
> how the places where we decide to put accessibility
> stuff match up to this list and follow the discussions through
> on both fora it would be quite useful
>
Hello Andy, all.
I don't think there will be much of a match. The UK LOM Core has always
had an note in it saying that accessibility issues will be considered
when...errr...somebody else has done it [sorry, this rather loose
paraphrase does Lorna an injustice!] Any overlap will be accidental or
coincidental.
What would be interesting for this list is to know (roughly) how many
mandatory elements the APLR work proposes and the rationale behind
having mandatory elements.
Phil
--
Phil Barker Learning Technology Adviser
ICBL, School of Mathematics and Computer Science
Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS
Tel: work - 0131 451 3278 home - 0131 221 1352
Web: http://www.icbl.hw.ac.uk/~philb/
|