Andy Powell wrote:
> In discussion about RLLOMAP we weren't sure how to indicate that a record
> had been created in compliance with RLLOMAP version 1.0.
>
> Reading the UK LOM Core v 0.2, I assume that we are supposed to repeat
>
> 3.3 metadataSchema
>
> to provide three values
>
> LOMv1.0
> UKLOMCorev0.2
> RLLOMAPv1.0
>
> (or whatever). Is this correct?
>
yes.
P.
--
Phil Barker Learning Technology Adviser
ICBL, School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences
Mountbatten Building, Heriot-Watt University,
Edinburgh, EH14 4AS
Tel: 0131 451 3278 Fax: 0131 451 3327
Web: http://www.icbl.hw.ac.uk/~philb/
|