Which will technically be incorrect for most of the libraries since no-one
has ever done an audit or issued explicit licence approval for each
library.
Tim
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004, Rankin, SE (Stephen) wrote:
> Tim,
>
> >I wander what licence they are using for the starlink
> >modules....
>
> I downloaded one of the RPM files and it had GPL licence in the RPM
> information.
>
> Steve.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Starlink development [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Tim
> Jenness
> Sent: 16 June 2004 02:25
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: AST usage
>
> On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, Peter W. Draper wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, David Berry wrote:
> >
> > > > PS Does anyone know anything about PDL linux? Bizarrely
> > > >
> > > >
> http://buildlogs.pld-linux.org/index.php?idx=7&ok=1&ns=0&cnt=16&action=qa
> > > >
> > > > indicates that there are loads of starlink libraries in it. It seems
> to be
> > > > Polish and a quick search on rpm.pbone.net shows you all the starlink
> > > > RPMs. I haven't found which application they are building that
> requires
> > > > these RPMs but it might be worth talking to the maintainer.
> > >
> > > Odd!
> >
> > Indeed, that is odd, but less spectacular than an quick glance might
> > suggest. The libraries present seem to be those needed for the Perl FITS
> > modules (cfitsio & NDF et al.).
> >
>
> Actually, I think that they are there because of PerlDL which has optional
> support for GSD and NDF I/O. They've clearly wanted to fully spec perldl.
> I'm very impressed. [I wander what licence they are using for the starlink
> modules....]
>
> --
> Tim Jenness
> JAC software
> http://www.jach.hawaii.edu/~timj
>
--
Tim Jenness
JAC software
http://www.jach.hawaii.edu/~timj
|