JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ACAD-AE-MED Archives


ACAD-AE-MED Archives

ACAD-AE-MED Archives


ACAD-AE-MED@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ACAD-AE-MED Home

ACAD-AE-MED Home

ACAD-AE-MED  June 2004

ACAD-AE-MED June 2004

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: deceased skills training

From:

Simon McCormick <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Accident and Emergency Academic List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 1 Jun 2004 08:29:20 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (105 lines)

I understand what you're saying Paul but are we really the best place for
someone to say goodbye to their relatives?  If you are bringing in someone
from an ambulance to continue resuscitation and they die then fair enough,
continuity of care etc deems it important that we deal with what happens.
However, if someone is dead on arrival and we are not allowed to certify in
the back of an ambulance then resus must continue into the department and
therefore into a resus bay prior to a decision being taken to stop.  This
ties up a resus space, two nurses and atleast one doctor for a period of
time.  Following this a nurse will find his/her time taken up for anything
up to an hour or more dealing with the relatives.  These relatives are
occupying our only relatives room so we cannot put anyone else in there or
we have to gently push them out (towards the mortuary anyway) to make space
for the next set of relatives.  All this for a patient who was dead on
arrival and could have gone to the mortuary where they have a fair degree of
experience dealing with death, dying and relatives.  They also don't have
the distraction of further resus cases, drunks and screaming children.  They
will end up dealing with the patient/relatives anyway so why not let them do
so from the start.  In any case, we deal with the relatives of BIDs in the
first instance but then pass them on to the mortuary where it is quiet and
they can spend as much time as they wish with their loved one.

Don't get me wrong, I sincerly believe that dealing with acutely grieving
relatives is something we should be very good at but I don't believe we are
the only people who can do so.  Declaring a patient BID is a LOT less work
for my department than a DID, allows us to concentrate more on the (slightly
more) living and lets the mortuary staff do their work.

Simon McCormick

----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Ransom" <[log in to unmask]>
To: "Simon Mccormick" <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 7:27 PM
Subject: Re: deceased skills training


> I used to be in favour of certifying in the ambulance and then the body
> can move straight to the mortuary,  but have converted to the BAEM
> suggestion because of the relatives who follow on.  Dealing with
> grieving relatives is something we are usually pretty good at,  there is
> a room,  nurses,  telephones etc,  unlike in the mortuary.  It may be a
> little more work for us,  but you have to ask yourself where would YOU
> want to say good bye to your recently deceased relative ?
>
> Paul Ransom
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Accident and Emergency Academic List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Simon McCormick
> Sent: 31 May 2004 10:02
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: deceased skills training
>
>
> I agree that we resuscitate in futile circumstances all to often, so how
> does this square with the BAEM view that we should not certify patients
> in the back of an ambulance.  Surely a patient is as dead in the
> ambulance as in a resus room.  Whilst you continue resus in to the
> department before you officially end it you tie up a number of staff.
> for no good reason.  It is interesting that this edict from BAEM
> appeared 18 months ago, was then hastily withdrawn and hasn't been heard
> of again.
>
> Simon McCormick
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ray McGlone" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: "Simon Mccormick" <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, May 30, 2004 9:50 PM
> Subject: Re: deceased skills training
>
>
> > I agree. We need to teach staff when to stop... as well as when to
> > start resuscitation.
> >
> > Ray McGlone
> > Lancaster
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Rowley Cottingham" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Sunday, May 30, 2004 6:13 PM
> > Subject: Re: deceased skills training
> >
> >
> > > I would go further. I am increasingly concerned at the number of
> > > clearly
> > futile resuscitation
> > > attempts that drag on and on through cycle after cycle, often on
> children
> > or young adults because
> > > people are not brave enough to say that the person is dead. I regard
> this
> > as abuse of the newly
> > > dead, and I have intervened countless times to stop them.
> > >
> > > Rowley Cottingham.
> > >
> > > Consultant in Emergency Medicine.
> > >
> >
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
September 2022
July 2022
February 2022
January 2022
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
September 2019
March 2019
April 2018
January 2018
November 2017
May 2017
March 2017
November 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
October 2014
September 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
February 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
May 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager