JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for STARDEV Archives


STARDEV Archives

STARDEV Archives


STARDEV@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

STARDEV Home

STARDEV Home

STARDEV  June 2004

STARDEV June 2004

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

16 bit grayscale, jpeg2000, java

From:

Norman Gray <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Starlink development <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 20 Jun 2004 21:15:40 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (103 lines)

All,

This message appeared on [log in to unmask] It's talking about
cross-platform support for images (specifically JPEG) in Java. It's
asking for advice rather than giving answers, but in doing so it gives
a useful-sounding summary of the problem. Since there's at least some
overlap with our imaging domain, I thought I might as well pass it on.

See you,

Norman


Begin forwarded message:

> From: Michael Harm <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: 2004 June 20 19.47.02 BST
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: advice needed: 16 bit grayscale, jpeg2000, java
>
> Hi.
>
> A long while ago I posted some questions about 16 bit grayscale images
> and apple's implementation of 2d imaging. I was getting some pretty
> poor performance numbers. After going around a bit, and trying out
> suggestions from people from this list (many thanks!), I concluded
> that while 16 bit/channel images are supported in the java spec, both
> the OSX and windows flavors of java have extremely poor performance on
> these image types. I guess the developers put their effort into what
> is most common, unsurprisingly.
>
> So my solution was to hand-code certain stereotypical operations in
> 'c', and use jni. For things like brightness/contrast (essential for
> 16 bit/channnel images if you want to display them on a conventional
> monitor), I got a speedup of, oh, a factor of 20 or more over
> comparable java 2d code using filters or affine transforms. And using
> jni wasn't so terrible, because I was using the "kakadu" jpeg2000
> codec, which is also native 'c', so I was stuck in cross-compile land
> anyway.
>
> But I'm getting some heat from my supervisors over the proliferation
> of jni code in our apps. What I need is a way to work with jpeg2000
> images, 16 bit/channel (virtually all medical images > 8
> bits/channel.. CT, MRI, Xray), in a way that removes the burden of
> maintaining jni code from us. So I'd like something that can do
> 12/16 bit/channel image processing with jpeg2000, cross platform.
>
> Here's where the catch-22 comes in. JAI on windows/linux supports
> jpeg2000. And apple now supports JAI. Sounds promising, yes? But it
> turns out that JAI on windows is really slow... I suspect they're
> using jj2000 (a pure java jpeg2000 codec), or something similar, and
> I've found it to be over 10 times slower than kakadu. I guess their
> native performance packs only work with certain image formats (like
> vanilla jpeg, which doesn't support the 12 bit/channel jpeg format.
> sigh.) Plus, evidently, apple's jai doesn't support jpeg2000 anyway.
> So, so much for jai.
>
> Quicktime for java seems to have been brought back from the dead. And
> it is cross platform, and uses underlying native code for speed. That
> seems promising, yes? But, according to
> http://www.apple.com/quicktime/products/qt/specifications.html,
> jpeg2000 is only supported in quicktime on the mac. Some two years
> ago I looked at quicktime/java for my jpeg2000 stuff, and it only
> existed on the mac,
> so it was a non-starter for us. I guess that's still the case. (Hey,
> any apple developers on this list: when are you gonna support jpeg2000
> in quicktime on windows? QuickTime *could* be the only game in town
> for cross platform j2k imaging if you'd make it available...)
>
> So that's my dilemma. Medical images use 16 (actually 12)
> bits/channel. java's jpeg implementation doesn't support that format,
> so we like jpeg2000 to compress such things. All the pure-java
> jpeg2000 implementations I've tried are dog-slow. QT/java only
> supports j2k on the mac. JAI only supports it on windows/linux and is
> also too slow.
>
> I'm at a loss. Any suggestions on good toolkits out there to
> compress/decompress jpeg2000 images? Any good cross-platform packages
> that utilize native code plugins for 16 bit image manipulation (like
> what jai is supposed to be, but isn't yet?)
>
> Before I launch myself at writing a jai codec myself, built on the
> kakadu codec, has anyone found such a beast out there? Any experience
> with Aware.com's products?
>
> Thanks for any help!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mike Harm
> _______________________________________________
> java-dev mailing list | [log in to unmask]
> Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
> http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/java-dev
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>
>
>
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Norman Gray / Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, UK
http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/norman/

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

December 2023
January 2023
December 2022
July 2022
June 2022
April 2022
March 2022
December 2021
October 2021
July 2021
April 2021
January 2021
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
May 2020
November 2019
October 2019
July 2019
June 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
August 2018
July 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
December 2017
October 2017
August 2017
July 2017
May 2017
April 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
2004
April 2003
2003


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager