It's Ok, I was quite comfy with Larry's reply. We are probably getting "off
list" with this discussion but there must be many individuals who would
self-classify as disabled and who experience discrimination as a result of
their impairment but who might have difficulty in being covered by the Act.
Out of interest, can anyone refer me to a summary document for who would be
covered by similar legislation in other countries?
Claire
-----Original Message-----
From: The Disability-Research Discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Chris Benson
Sent: 26 May 2004 10:22
To:
Subject: Re: SENDA and UK HE[Scanned]
Rather harsh reply Larry
Reading and writing are not a day to day activity for the purposes of the
DDA. To be covered your impairment has to affect one of these
a) Mobility;
b) Manual dexterity;
c) Physical co-ordination;
d) Continence
e) Ability to lift, carry or otherwise move everyday objects;
f) Speech, hearing or eyesight;
g) Memory or ability to concentrate, learn or understand;
or
h) Perception of the risk of physical danger.
Note that reading and writing is not there neither is work or school or
college. This list is exhaustive and if you cannot shoe horn your
impairment into one of these categories you are not covered.
Chris Benson
-----Original Message-----
From: Larry Arnold [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 25 May 2004 06:15
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: SENDA and UK HE[Scanned]
Really what century do you inhabit?
Is not reading and writing a daily task since the advent of general literacy
and universal schooling ?
Larry
> -----Original Message-----
> From: The Disability-Research Discussion List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Claire Wickham
> Sent: 24 May 2004 22:43
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: SENDA and UK HE[Scanned]
>
>
> Chris et al,
>
> Your selection of a dyslexic student as your example raised an interesting
> issue for me. As I understand it, a dyslexic student might find
> it difficult
> to prove that they were included within the DDA definition of a disabled
> person as they might have no difficulties in carrying out daily tasks.
> (Although they may be disabled in HE if no adjustments are made).
> Has there
> been clarification of this point?
>
> And just to open this up to the rest of the world: does disability
> legislation ion other countries include dyslexic people within the
> definition of "disabled"?
>
> ATB
>
> Claire
>
________________End of message______________________
Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List
are now located at:
www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.
________________End of message______________________
Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List
are now located at:
www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.
________________End of message______________________
Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List
are now located at:
www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.
|